Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  P.K. v. FINLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2, Art. 57 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (31)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 17.01.1970 - 2689/65

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 37442/97

  The Court first recalls that when a right to appeal exists under domestic law, Article 6 § 1 applies also to proceedings on appeal (see e.g. Delcourt v. Belgium judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 13-15, §§ 25 - 26).
• EKMR, 16.04.1998 - 30519/96

  KARJALAINEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 37442/97

  In these circumstances the fact that the new presiding judge had at his disposal the minutes of the session at which the witness had been heard (cf. Karjalainen v. Finland, application no. 30519/96, Commission decision of 16 April 1998, unreported) to a large extent compensates for the lack of the immediacy of the proceedings.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 12.03.2003 - 46221/99

  Freiheit der Person (rechtmäßige Freiheitsentziehung; effektives …

  Rn. 153 95. It is true that a change in the composition of a trial court in the course of the proceedings need not necessarily give rise to an issue under Article 6 § 1 (see, in this connection, P.K. v. Finland (dec) no. 37442/97, 9 July 2002).
• EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 36658/05

  MURTAZALIYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Škaro v. Croatia, no. 6962/13, § 24, 6 December 2016; Tolmachev v. Estonia, no. 73748/13, § 52, 9 July 2015; Matytsina v. Russia, no. 58428/10, § 153, 27 March 2014; Beraru v. Romania, no. 40107/04, § 64, 18 March 2014; Cutean v. Romania, no. 53150/12, § 60, 2 December 2014; Pichugin v. Russia, no. 38623/03, § 199, 23 October 2012; Graviano v. Italy, no. 10075/02, § 39, 10 February 2005; and P.K. v. Finland (dec.), no. 37442/97, 9 July 2002.
• EGMR, 01.09.2026 - 30395/20

  BRUNELL v. THE NETHERLANDS

  However, in those cases, the credibility of the witness concerned had not been contested (see, for example, Mellors v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 57836/00, 30 January 2003, and P.K. v. Finland (dec.), no. 37442/97, 9 July 2002).

• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 56396/12

  PEREIRA CRUZ c. PORTUGAL et 3 autres affaires

  Dans un tel contexte et eu égard à l'importance du principe de l'immédiateté des preuves en matière pénale, qui fait prévaloir les déclarations faites devant le prétoire sur les déclarations écrites (voir, mutatis mutandis, P.K. c. Finlande (déc.), no 37442/97, 9 juillet 2002, et Škaro, précité, §§ 23-24), on ne peut dire que les requérants ont été empêchés de mettre en cause la crédibilité des victimes pour la seule raison qu'ils n'ont pas pu les confronter avec les déclarations qu'elles avaient tenues devant la police.
• EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 68939/12

  CEROVSEK v. SLOVENIA and 1 other application

  Therefore, as recognised through the principle of the immediacy in criminal proceedings (see Cutean, cited above, §§ 60 and 61, and P.K. v. Finland (dec.), no. 37442/97, 9 July 2002; see also the Slovenian Constitutional Court's decision of 11 October 2006 cited in paragraph 28 above), Judge A.K.'s observation of the demeanour of the witnesses and the applicants and her assessment of their credibility must have constituted an important, if not decisive, element in the establishment of the facts on which the applicants' convictions were based.
• EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 57575/14

  DAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  Therefore, a change in the composition of the trial court after the hearing of an important witness should normally lead to the rehearing of that witness (see P.K. v. Finland (dec.), no. 37442/97, 9 July 2002; Chernika v. Ukraine, no. 53791/11, § 47, 12 March 2020).
• EGMR, 12.03.2020 - 53791/11
  Therefore, a change in the composition of the trial court after the hearing of an important witness should normally lead to the rehearing of that witness (see P.K. v. Finland (dec.), no. 37442/97, 9 July 2002).
• EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 46/15

  DANIELA NASTASE v. ROMANIA and 1 other application

  Ce principe d'immédiateté est une garantie importante du procès pénal en ce que les observations faites par le juge au sujet du comportement et de la crédibilité d'un témoin peuvent avoir de lourdes conséquences pour l'accusé (P.K. c. Finlande (déc.), no 37442/97, 9 juillet 2002).
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 53150/12

  CUTEAN v. ROMANIA

  The applicant contended that in the present case, unlike in the cases of Karjalainen v. Finland, no. 30519/96, Commission decision of 16 April 1998, unreported, and P.K. v. Finland (dec.), no. 37442/97, 9 July 2002, the entire panel of judges who had heard the applicant and the witnesses directly had been changed.
• EGMR, 09.03.2004 - 30508/96

  PITKANEN v. FINLAND

  A change in the composition of the trial court after the hearing of an important witness should therefore normally lead to the rehearing of that witness (P.K. v. Finland, no. 37442/97, 9 July 2002; see also Eerola v. Finland, 42059/98, struck out 6 May 2003 following a friendly settlement).
• EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 36605/04

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 28183/03

  ANGHEL c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 30.11.2006 - 75101/01

  GRECU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 25.07.2019 - 37809/08

  SVANIDZE v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 26.03.2019 - 30180/11

  FAMULYAK v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 10.02.2005 - 10075/02

  GRAVIANO c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 03.06.2025 - 7908/17

  MANOLACHE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 6962/13

  SKARO v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 4710/04

  DUMITRU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 12.03.2024 - 48309/17

  SAHIN v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 23.02.2021 - 62915/17

  IANCU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 01.07.2025 - 2089/20

  DUMITRU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 25.01.2022 - 2715/15

  TRIPODO c. ITALIE
• EGMR, 28.09.2021 - 62775/15

  POTERAS c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 48093/15

  ANTOHI v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 09.07.2015 - 73748/13

  TOLMACHEV v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 4784/02

  CASATI contre l'ITALIE
• EGMR, 05.11.2024 - 37324/16

  MIRON v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 28.11.2023 - 15736/22

  ALPPI v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 50296/16

  COMAN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 32219/02

  MILAN contre l'ITALIE