Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CEBOTARI AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 07.06.2005 - 71186/01

  FUKLEV v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 37763/04

  The Court noted that State responsibility for enforcement of a judgment against a private company extends no further than the involvement of State bodies in the enforcement procedures (see Fuklev v. Ukraine, no. 71186/01, § 67 and §§ 90-91, 7 June 2005).

  Consequently, the State failed to comply with its obligation to secure to the applicant the effective enjoyment of his right of property, as guaranteed by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1." (no. 71186/01, 7 June 2005).

• EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 28249/95

  KREUZ c. POLOGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 37763/04

  The Court reiterates that fulfilment of the obligation to secure effective rights under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention does not mean merely the absence of an interference but may require the State to take various forms of positive action (see Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, § 59, ECHR 2001-VI).
• EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 50342/99

  SANGLIER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 37763/04

  However, the right of "access to court" does not impose an obligation on a State to execute every judgment of a civil character without having regard to the particular circumstances of a case (see Sanglier v. France, no. 50342/99, § 39, 27 May 2003).

• EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 9353/13

  MEREACRE ET AUTRES c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  Dans l'arrêt de principe Cebotari et autres c. République de Moldova (nos 37763/04 et 4 autres, 27 janvier 2009), la Cour a conclu à la violation de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention et de l'article 1 du Protocole no 1 en raison des manquements des autorités étatiques relativement à l'exécution d'une décision de justice délivrée, comme dans la présente affaire, contre un débiteur privé.
• EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 8229/04

  MOLDOVAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  When the authorities are obliged to act in order to enforce a judgment and they fail to do so, their inaction can engage the State's responsibility under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Cebotari and Others v. Moldova, nos. 37763/04, 37712/04, 35247/04, 35178/04 and 34350/04, § 39, 27 January 2009).
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 12694/04

  LACATUS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  When the authorities are obliged to act in order to enforce a judgment and they fail to do so, their inaction can engage the State's responsibility under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Cebotari and Others v. Moldova, nos. 37763/04, 37712/04, 35247/04, 35178/04 and 34350/04, § 39, 27 January 2009).

 
• EGMR, 15.06.2023 - 39258/14

  F.C.P. CORNA S.R.L. c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  La jurisprudence de la Cour en matière d'inexécution ou d'exécution tardive est claire et abondante (voir, par exemple, Cebotari et autres c. Moldova, nos 37763/04 et 4 autres, 27 janvier 2009, et Cristea c. République de Moldova, no 35098/12, 12 février 2019).
• EGMR, 19.11.2013 - 26270/04

  BOGDAN VODA GREEK-CATHOLIC PARISH v. ROMANIA

  When the authorities are obliged to act in order to enforce a judgment and they fail to do so, their inaction can engage the State's responsibility under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Cebotari and Others v. Moldova, nos. 37763/04, 37712/04, 35247/04, 35178/04 and 34350/04, § 39, 27 January 2009).
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 38798/07

  GULMAMMADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  When the authorities are obliged to act in order to enforce a judgment and they fail to do so, their failure to take action can engage the State's responsibility under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Cebotari and Others v. Moldova, nos. 37763/04, 37712/04, 35247/04, 35178/04 and 34350/04, § 39, 27 January 2009).
• EGMR, 04.05.2023 - 38094/15

  SECRIERU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  La jurisprudence de la Cour en matière d'inexécution ou d'exécution tardive de décisions de justice internes est claire et abondante (voir, par exemple, Cebotari et autres c. Moldova, nos 37763/04 et 4 autres, 27 janvier 2009 ; Cristea c. République de Moldova, no 35098/12, 12 février 2019).
• EGMR, 04.05.2023 - 32607/16

  GÎRBU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

  La jurisprudence de la Cour en matière d'inexécution ou d'exécution tardive de décisions de justice internes est claire et abondante (voir, par exemple, Cebotari et autres c. Moldova, nos 37763/04 et 4 autres, 27 janvier 2009 ; Cristea c. République de Moldova, no 35098/12, 12 février 2019).
• EGMR, 22.04.2010 - 50757/07

  HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  When the authorities are obliged to act in order to enforce a judgment and they fail to do so, their failure to take action can engage the State's responsibility under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Cebotari and Others v. Moldova, nos. 37763/04, 37712/04, 35247/04, 35178/04 and 34350/04, § 39, 27 January 2009).
• EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 17276/07

  JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  When the authorities are obliged to act in order to enforce a judgment and they fail to do so, their failure to take action can engage the State's responsibility under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Cebotari and Others v. Moldova, nos. 37763/04, 37712/04, 35247/04, 35178/04 and 34350/04, § 39, 27 January 2009).
• EGMR, 03.12.2009 - 50187/06

  MIRZAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 4582/06

  OSMANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 19.10.2023 - 16715/13

  MUNTEANU NANI ET AUTRES c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA