Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BARKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (17)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 46303/10 (anhängig)

  PFLYAUM c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  (Applications nos. 38054/05, 38092/05, 2178/07, 21770/07, 4708/09, 46303/10, 70688/10, 30537/11 and 43594/11).

  The case originated in nine applications (nos. 38054/05, 38092/05, 2178/07, 21770/07, 4708/09, 46303/10, 70688/10, 30537/11 and 43594/11) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by nine Russian nationals ("the applicants"), whose names and the dates on which they introduced their applications are set out in Appendix I.

  46303/10.

  46303/10.

• EGMR - 21770/07

  BABAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  (Applications nos. 38054/05, 38092/05, 2178/07, 21770/07, 4708/09, 46303/10, 70688/10, 30537/11 and 43594/11).

  The case originated in nine applications (nos. 38054/05, 38092/05, 2178/07, 21770/07, 4708/09, 46303/10, 70688/10, 30537/11 and 43594/11) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by nine Russian nationals ("the applicants"), whose names and the dates on which they introduced their applications are set out in Appendix I.

  21770/07.

  21770/07.

• EGMR - 38092/05

  FEDCHENKO v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  (Applications nos. 38054/05, 38092/05, 2178/07, 21770/07, 4708/09, 46303/10, 70688/10, 30537/11 and 43594/11).

  The case originated in nine applications (nos. 38054/05, 38092/05, 2178/07, 21770/07, 4708/09, 46303/10, 70688/10, 30537/11 and 43594/11) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by nine Russian nationals ("the applicants"), whose names and the dates on which they introduced their applications are set out in Appendix I.

  38092/05.

  38092/05.

• EGMR - 2178/07

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  (Applications nos. 38054/05, 38092/05, 2178/07, 21770/07, 4708/09, 46303/10, 70688/10, 30537/11 and 43594/11).

  The case originated in nine applications (nos. 38054/05, 38092/05, 2178/07, 21770/07, 4708/09, 46303/10, 70688/10, 30537/11 and 43594/11) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by nine Russian nationals ("the applicants"), whose names and the dates on which they introduced their applications are set out in Appendix I.

  2178/07.

  2178/07.

• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 11/05

  GÜRBÜZ AND ÖZÇELIK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  11/05/2010.
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 07.10.2005 - 18/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  18/04/2011.
• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  In the recent case of Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) (no. 22251/08, ECHR 2015), the Grand Chamber laid down the principles applicable to the reopening of terminated civil proceedings on the basis of the Court's judgment (further case references, in brackets, omitted):.
• EGMR, 18.02.2009 - 55707/00

  Andrejeva ./. Lettland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  Furthermore, costs and expenses are only recoverable in so far as they relate to the violation found (see, among many other authorities, Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 115, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 20075/03

  SHILBERGS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  The Court notes that, as in many similar cases against Russia, the applicants were denied leave to appear by reference to the absence of any legal norm making their presence mandatory (see Bortkevich v. Russia, no. 27359/05, §§ 63-69, 2 October 2012; Karpenko v. Russia, no. 5605/04, §§ 89-94, 13 March 2012; Roman Karasev v. Russia, no. 30251/03, § 68, 25 November 2010; Artyomov v. Russia, no. 14146/02, §§ 204-08, 27 May 2010; and Shilbergs v. Russia, no. 20075/03, § 107, 17 December 2009).
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13470/02

  KHUZHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.07.2016 - 38054/05

  As it happened, the appeal courts denied the applicants the opportunity to attend the hearings, irrespective of the subject matter of the proceedings, and did not apprise them of that decision sufficiently in advance (see Gryaznov, cited above, § 48, and Khuzhin and Others v. Russia, no. 13470/02, § 107, 23 October 2008).
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 14146/02

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 5605/04

  KARPENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 30251/03

  ROMAN KARASEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 19673/03

  GRYAZNOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.10.2014 - 18967/07

  DAVYDOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 27359/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 23243/03

  SOKUR v. RUSSIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 46303/10 (anhängig)

  PFLYAUM c. RUSSIE

  Affaire no 70688/10 introduite le 11 mai 2010 par Murat Ismailovich SHAVAYEV né le 17 février 1975.

  Affaire no 30537/11 introduite le 14 avril 2011 par Vyacheslav Nikolayevich STARODUBTSEV né le 17 décembre 1969.

  Dans la requête no 70688/10, le requérant se plaint de ne pas avoir pu communiquer avec l'avocat désigné par le tribunal.

  Requête no 70688/10:.

  Requête no 30537/11:.

  70688/10.

  30537/11.

• EGMR, 09.04.2019 - 18255/10

  TOMOV v. RUSSIA

  Given the broad scope of review of the appellate court, the fair trial guarantees enshrined in Article 6 of the Convention, including in particular the right to make oral submissions to the court, were as important in the appellate proceedings as they were in the first-instance courts (see Gankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 2430/06 and 3 others, § 40, 31 May 2016, and Barkov and Others v. Russia, no. 38054/05 and 8 others, 19 July 2016).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 42399/13

  IGRANOV v. RUSSIA and 18 other applications

  By contrast, the appeal judgment by the Perm Regional Court of 31 May 2017 in case no. 33-5962 dismissed an application for the reopening of proceedings lodged by Mr Davydov, in respect of whom the Court found a similar violation (see Barkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 38054/05 and 8 others, 19 July 2016).
• EGMR - 21770/07

  BABAN v. RUSSIA

  Application no 4708/09 lodged on 15 October 2008 by Vasiliy Arkadyevich BOGATYREV who was born on 11 March 1959 and lived until his arrest in the town of Yelabuga, Tatarstan Republic.

  Application no 43594/11 lodged on 18 April 2011 by Andrey Nikolayevich YAKOVLEV who was born on 24 June 1967 and lived before his arrest in the town of Turinsk, Sverdlovsk Region.

• EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 20489/07

  URUKOV v. RUSSIA

  Finally, the Court notes that the applicant did not take part in the appellate proceedings and that the Supreme Court made no assessment of the effect that his absence may have had on the fairness of the proceedings (compare Barkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 38054/05 and 8 others, §§ 18-23, 19 July 2016).