Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  K.A.S. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
  Struck out of the list (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  K.A.S. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 40016/98

  KARNER c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 38844/12

  Such circumstances exist when the continued examination of an application would contribute to elucidating, safeguarding and developing the standards of protection under the Convention (see, for example, Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, § 27, ECHR 2003-IX).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 24027/07

  Briten dürfen Hassprediger an USA ausliefern

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 38844/12

  24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09, § 175, 6 July 2010, this Court had stated that there was no right not to be extradited and that, by implication, there was no right to be prosecuted in a particular jurisdiction and thus that it was not for the Court to adjudicate on the natural forum for prosecution.
• EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 9742/07

  KING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 38844/12

  Rn. 27 In King v. the United Kingdom (dec), no. 9742/07, § 29, 26 January 2010, this Court had observed that considerations as to whether prosecution existed as an alternative may have a bearing on whether the extradition would be in violation of one of the rights guaranteed by the Convention.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10

  Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände

  Before striking out an application, even in cases where the applicant wishes to withdraw it, the Court must, under Article 37 § 1 in fine, consider whether there are circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case (see K.A.S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 38844/12, § 45, 4 June 2013, citing Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, §§ 24-27, Series A no. 26).