Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  R.A. v. NORWAY

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  R.A. v. NORWAY

  Art. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (8)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 64639/16

  M.L. v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 44598/19

  Those shortcomings have either in themselves led to the finding of a violation (see K.O. and V.M. v. Norway, no. 64808/16, §§ 67-71, 19 November 2019) or formed important parts of the context in which violations have occurred (see Strand Lobben and Others, cited above, §§ 221 and 225; Pedersen and Others v. Norway, no. 39710/15, §§ 67-69, 10 March 2020; Hernehult v. Norway, no. 14652/16, §§ 73-74, 10 March 2020; and M.L. v. Norway, no. 64639/16, §§ 92-94, 22 December 2020).
• EGMR, 03.05.2016 - 7183/11

  LETINCIC v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 44598/19

  In particular, regard must be had to such factors as the expert's procedural position and role in the relevant proceedings (see Sara Lind Eggertsdóttir v. Iceland, no. 31930/04, § 47, 5 July 2007, and Letinčić v. Croatia, no. 7183/11, § 51, 3 May 2016 with further references).
• EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13

  K.B. AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 44598/19

  Furthermore, in the Court's assessment, the importance given to the child's own wishes in the light of her age and level of maturity aligned with its general case-law concerning the importance that ought to be given to children's views in matters which concern them (see, for example, K.B. and Others v. Croatia, no. 36216/13, § 143, 14 March 2017, and the cases cited therein).

• EGMR, 10.03.2020 - 39710/15

  PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 44598/19

  Those shortcomings have either in themselves led to the finding of a violation (see K.O. and V.M. v. Norway, no. 64808/16, §§ 67-71, 19 November 2019) or formed important parts of the context in which violations have occurred (see Strand Lobben and Others, cited above, §§ 221 and 225; Pedersen and Others v. Norway, no. 39710/15, §§ 67-69, 10 March 2020; Hernehult v. Norway, no. 14652/16, §§ 73-74, 10 March 2020; and M.L. v. Norway, no. 64639/16, §§ 92-94, 22 December 2020).
• EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 64808/16

  K.O. AND v.M. v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 44598/19

  Those shortcomings have either in themselves led to the finding of a violation (see K.O. and V.M. v. Norway, no. 64808/16, §§ 67-71, 19 November 2019) or formed important parts of the context in which violations have occurred (see Strand Lobben and Others, cited above, §§ 221 and 225; Pedersen and Others v. Norway, no. 39710/15, §§ 67-69, 10 March 2020; Hernehult v. Norway, no. 14652/16, §§ 73-74, 10 March 2020; and M.L. v. Norway, no. 64639/16, §§ 92-94, 22 December 2020).
• EGMR, 10.03.2020 - 14652/16

  HERNEHULT v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 44598/19

  Those shortcomings have either in themselves led to the finding of a violation (see K.O. and V.M. v. Norway, no. 64808/16, §§ 67-71, 19 November 2019) or formed important parts of the context in which violations have occurred (see Strand Lobben and Others, cited above, §§ 221 and 225; Pedersen and Others v. Norway, no. 39710/15, §§ 67-69, 10 March 2020; Hernehult v. Norway, no. 14652/16, §§ 73-74, 10 March 2020; and M.L. v. Norway, no. 64639/16, §§ 92-94, 22 December 2020).
• EGMR, 20.01.2022 - 45889/18

  A.L. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 44598/19

  In cases with facts similar to those in the above-mentioned cases with regard to the justifications given for decisions to severely limit the right to contact between the parents and their children, the Court may find that a decision on contact rights does not stand up to the "stricter scrutiny" that it requires where such far-reaching measures as those adopted in the instant case have been imposed (see, for example, A.L. and Others v. Norway, no. 45889/18, § 51, 20 January 2022).
• EGMR, 19.05.2022 - 21574/16

  ROENGKASETTAKORN ERIKSSON v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 44598/19

  The Court reiterates in that connection that its task is not to substitute itself for the domestic authorities in the exercise of their responsibilities for the regulation of the care of children and the rights of parents whose children have been taken into public care, but rather to review under the Convention the decisions taken by those authorities in the exercise of their power of appreciation (see Strand Lobben and Others, cited above, § 210, and, as a more recent example, Roengkasettakorn Eriksson v. Sweden, no. 21574/16, § 80, 19 May 2022).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 30.01.2025 - 63625/19

  MON c. FRANCE

  Concernant les principes généraux applicables, il est en outre renvoyé aux développements de l'arrêt Strand Lobben et autres c. Norvège ([GC], no 37283/13, §§ 202-213, 10 septembre 2019, et pour l'application de ces principes dans des affaires similaires au regard du maintien des liens parents-enfants, voir les décisions de comité du 11 juillet 2023, A.G. c. Norvège, no 14301/19, A.H. c. Norvège, no 39771/19, A.N. c. Norvège, no 12825/20, F.K. c. Norvège, no 51860/19, H.L. c. Norvège, no 59747/19, I.M. c. Norvège, no 16998/20, J.B. et E.M. c. Norvège, no 277/20, M.A. et autres c. Norvège, no 41172/20, R.A. c. Norvège, no 44598/19, R.I. c. Norvège, no 7692/20, R.K. et autres c. Norvège, no 45413/20, T.H. c. Norvège, no 42796/20, et comparer les arrêts de comité du 12 septembre 2023, D.R. et autres c. Norvège, no 63307/17 et 38105/19, K.F. et autres c. Norvège, no 39769/17 et 5 autres, et S.S. et J.H. c. Norvège, no 15784/19).