Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STRAND LOBBEN ET AUTRES c. NORVÈGE

  Exception préliminaire rejetée (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale (Article 8-1 - Respect de la vie familiale);Préjudice moral - réparation (Article 41 - ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY

  Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• famrz.de (Kurzinformation)

  Sorgeentzug zwecks Adoption eines Pflegekindes

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 30.11.2017 - 37283/13
• EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

Papierfundstellen

• NJW 2020, 3161

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (14)

• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  39221/98 and 41963/98, § 138, ECHR 2000-VIII, had been due to the particular circumstances of that case.

  39221/98 and 41963/98, § 138, ECHR 2000 VIII; and Sahin v. Germany (dec.), no. 30943/96, 12 December 2000).

• EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83

  OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  Another guiding principle is that a care order should be regarded as a temporary measure, to be discontinued as soon as circumstances permit, and that any measures implementing temporary care should be consistent with the ultimate aim of reuniting the natural parents and the child (see, for instance, Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 81, Series A no. 130).
• EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86

  VIDAL c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  It observed that as a general rule it was for the national courts to assess the evidence before them, including the means to ascertain the relevant facts (see Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 33, Series A no. 235-B).

 
• EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 56547/00

  P., C. ET S. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  It has been acknowledged in the case-law that the position of children under Article 34 of the Convention calls for careful consideration, since children must generally rely on other individuals to present their claims and represent their interests, and may not be of an age or capacity to authorise any steps to be taken on their behalf in any real sense (see A.K. and L. v. Croatia, no. 37956/11, § 47, 8 January 2013, and P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 56547/00, 11 November 2001).
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 28775/12

  R.M.S. c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  For example, the Court has in certain instances attached weight to whether the authorities, before taking a child into public care, had first attempted to take less drastic measures, such as supportive or preventive ones, and whether these had proved unsuccessful (see, for example, Olsson (no. 1), cited above, §§ 72-74; R.M.S. v. Spain, no. 28775/12, § 86, 18 June 2013, § 86; and Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, § 75, ECHR 2002-I).
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 71776/12

  N.TS. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  and Others v. Georgia, no. 71776/12, §§ 55-59, 2 February 2016).
• EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 37956/11

  A.K. AND L. v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  It has been acknowledged in the case-law that the position of children under Article 34 of the Convention calls for careful consideration, since children must generally rely on other individuals to present their claims and represent their interests, and may not be of an age or capacity to authorise any steps to be taken on their behalf in any real sense (see A.K. and L. v. Croatia, no. 37956/11, § 47, 8 January 2013, and P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 56547/00, 11 November 2001).
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 4547/10

  Y.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  What has to be determined is whether, having regard to the particular circumstances of the case and notably the serious nature of the decisions to be taken, the parents have been involved in the decision-making process, seen as a whole, to a degree sufficient to provide them with the requisite protection of their interests and have been able fully to present their case (see, for example, W. v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 64; T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945/95, § 72, ECHR 2001-V (extracts); Neulinger and Shuruk, cited above, § 139; and Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 4547/10, § 138, 13 March 2012).
• EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 38972/06

  GIUSTO, BORNACIN AND V. v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  The Court has found it necessary to avoid a restrictive and purely technical approach in this area; in particular, consideration must be given to the links between the child in question and his or her "representatives", to the subject-matter and the purpose of the application and to the possibility of a conflict of interests (see S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 23715/94, Commission decision of 20 May 1996, unreported; Giusto, Bornacin and V. v. Italy (dec.), no. 38972/06, ECHR 2007-V; and Moretti and Benedetti v. Italy (no. 16318/07, § 32, 27 April 2010).
• EKMR, 20.05.1996 - 23715/94

  S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2019 - 37283/13

  The Court has found it necessary to avoid a restrictive and purely technical approach in this area; in particular, consideration must be given to the links between the child in question and his or her "representatives", to the subject-matter and the purpose of the application and to the possibility of a conflict of interests (see S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 23715/94, Commission decision of 20 May 1996, unreported; Giusto, Bornacin and V. v. Italy (dec.), no. 38972/06, ECHR 2007-V; and Moretti and Benedetti v. Italy (no. 16318/07, § 32, 27 April 2010).
• EGMR, 23.03.1995 - 15318/89

  LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE (EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES)
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94

  Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
• EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83

  NORRIS c. IRLANDE
• EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 8153/04

  MARSÁLEK c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

• OVG Bremen, 15.04.2024 - 2 B 330/23

  Unbegleitete minderjährige Ausländer; Altersfeststellung; Handlungsfähigkeit; …

  Dabei ist immer das Verfahren als Ganzes ("decision-making process, seen as a whole") unter Berücksichtigung der Umstände des Einzelfalls ("particular circumstances of each case") zu betrachten (vgl. EGMR, Urt. v. 37283/13 - 37283/13, Strand Lobben u.a. ./. Norwegen, NJW 2020, 3161, Rn. 212 f.;… Urt. v. 08.04.2004 - 11057/02, Haase ./. Deutschland, EuGRZ 2004, 715, Rn. 94).