Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BECHI v. ROMANIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 14+3 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BECHI v. ROMANIA

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Zitiert selbst (15)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  Rn. 84 The Court reiterates that, according to its established case-law, Article 13 of the Convention applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131, and Narcisio v. Netherlands (dec.), no. 47810/99, 27 January 2005).
• EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 18059/06

  WALTER v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  Having regard to the finding in paragraph 80 above that the applicant's complaint under Article 8 of the Convention is manifestly ill-founded, the Court concludes that the applicant did not have an "arguable claim" for the purposes of Article 13 (see, mutatis mutandis, Walter v. Italy (dec.), no. 18059/06, 11 July 2006).
• EGMR, 27.01.2005 - 47810/99

  NARCISIO v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  Rn. 84 The Court reiterates that, according to its established case-law, Article 13 of the Convention applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131, and Narcisio v. Netherlands (dec.), no. 47810/99, 27 January 2005).

• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 27996/06

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  27996/06 and 34836/06, § 44, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

  Michail Borissowitsch Chodorkowski

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  It would be fundamentally wrong to analyse each and every case of detention following conviction from the standpoint of Article 8 and to consider the "lawfulness" and "proportionality" of the prison sentence as such (see Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05, § 835, 25 July 2013, and Labaca Larrea and Others v. France (dec.), no. 56710/13 and others, § 41, 7 February 2017).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 34369/97

  Thlimmenos ./. Griechenland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  Rn. 63 Therefore, in the light of the above the Court finds that in the present case any differential treatment implemented was meant to provide the applicant with better conditions (better than those available to ordinary detainees) that were tailored to his medical needs and well-being (see Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 44, ECHR 2000-IV; Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 61467/12

  REZMIVES c. ROUMANIE et 3 autres affaires

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  Rn. 34 Excerpts from the relevant reports by the Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) concerning the situation in Romanian prisons are quoted in Rezmiveş and Others v. Romania (nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, §§ 48-56, 25 April 2017).
• EGMR, 30.06.2015 - 41418/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  Rn. 72 Any detention entails by its nature a limitation on a prisoner's private and family life (see, among other authorities, Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 106, 30 June 2015, and Vintman v. Ukraine, no. 28403/05, § 77, 23 October 2014).
• EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 73786/01

  CENBAUER CONTRE LA CROATIE ET 3 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  They argued that in view of the factual details concerning the applicant's detention in Târgu Ocna and Poarta Albă Prisons - in particular, the fact that he had had at least 3 square metres of personal space at his disposal, and most of the time more than that - the Court should apply the principles set out in the case of Muršić v. Croatia ([GC], no. 7334/13, 20 October 2016) and find that there had been enough elements present to compensate for the short periods during which he had had between 3 and 4 square metres of personal space.
• EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 35090/09

  POLYAKOVA v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 45709/20

  35090/09 and 3 others, § 100, 7 March 2017).
• EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 28403/05

  VINTMAN v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 14.01.2016 - 38771/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 56710/13

  LABACA LARREA c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 71645/13

  YANEZ PINON v. MALTA and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 77457/13

  DIKAIOU ET AUTRES c. GRÈCE

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.10.2026 - 40975/21
  Rn. 9 The general principles concerning the impact of detention and prison allocation on family life have been summarised in Bechi v. Romania (no. 45709/20, §§ 72-74, 25 June 2024) and, more generally, in Vintman v. Ukraine (no. 28403/05, §§ 76-79, 23 October 2014).
• EGMR, 12.12.2024 - 56545/21

  RIBÁR v. SLOVAKIA

  41995/14 and 50276/15, §§ 78 and 80, 7 January 2020 and Bechi v. Romania, no. 45709/20, § 51, 25 June 2024).
• EGMR, 24.06.2025 - 42588/20

  MOHÎRÈšA c. ROUMANIE

  Les principes applicables ont récemment été résumés dans l'arrêt Bechi c. Roumanie (no 45709/20, §§ 72-74, 25 juin 2024).
• EGMR, 17.06.2025 - 3485/21

  ANDRONACHE v. ROMANIA

  The relevant provisions of the Execution of Sentences Act (Law no. 254/2013 on sentencing and the execution of sentences and detention measures) are described in Bechi v. Romania (no. 45709/20, § 24, 25 June 2024).