Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NIGMATULLIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Torture) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right ...

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (21)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 20605/11 (anhängig)

  PANCHENKO v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  Panchenko v. Russia, no. 20605/11 The events of 16-18 April 2010.

  The Court notes that the Government made preliminary objections in four cases, Nigmatullin v. Russia (no. 47821/09), Panchenko v. Russia (no. 20605/11), Klimnenko v. Russia (no. 33032/11), and Zaripov v. Russia (no. 56860/15).

  Panchenko v. Russia, no. 20605/11.

  20605/11.

• EGMR, 24.07.2014 - 46956/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  For the relevant provisions of domestic law on the prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment and the procedure for examining a criminal complaint, see Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, §§ 96-102, 24 July 2014, and Ryabtsev v. Russia, no. 13642/06, §§ 48-52, 14 November 2013.

  The investigators and courts based their findings on the results of the pre-investigation inquiry, which is the initial stage in dealing with a criminal complaint under Russian law and should normally be followed by the opening of a criminal case and the carrying out of an investigation if the information gathered has disclosed elements of a criminal offence (see Lyapin v. Russia, no. 46956/09, § 129, 24 July 2014).

• EGMR - 4057/10 (anhängig)

  DAURBEKOV v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  Daurbekov v. Russia, no. 4057/10.

  4057/10.

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  As to costs and expenses, the Court has to establish whether they were actually incurred and whether they were necessary and reasonable as to quantum (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324).
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  In the leading case of Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• VGH der UEK, 29.03.2005 - 29/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  29/01/1984.
• KAGH, 07.06.2013 - M 22/12

  Zustimmung der MAV beim Einsatz von Dienstleistungskräften (Anästhesieteam) - zum …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  22/12/1979.
• KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09

  Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  10/09/2009.
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 45044/06

  KSENZ AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  The Court finally considers that the Government's explanation lacks the assessment of the acts of the police officers in using force and the actions on the part of the applicant which could have justified the use of force, as well as the assessment whether the use of force was indispensable and not excessive (see Ksenz and Others v. Russia, nos. 45044/06 and 5 others, § 103, 12 December 2017).
• VK Niedersachsen, 20.09.2002 - 18/02

  Unverzüglichkeit der Rüge: Rügefrist beträgt bei einem fachkundigen Unternehmen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 47821/09

  18/02/2011.
• KAG Münster, 18.01.2007 - 10/06

  Abschluss eines beamtenähnlichen Arbeitsvertrages; Ersetzung der Zustimmung der …
• EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 38887/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 13642/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 10825/09

  OLISOV v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 49790/99

  TRUBNIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 64398/01

  SAMOYLOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 27610/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 39598/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 8461/03

  MOGILAT v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.10.2017 - 40384/06

  DEVYATKIN v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications
• EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 58040/08

  [ENG]

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 70713/12 (anhängig)

  KVASOV v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

  The Government are invited to submit in respect of Mr Mokhov (case no. 50144/13) copies of the certificate of the first-aid station (undated), the IVS note of 20/05/2009 and a copy of the final decision in the court proceedings that the applicant brought in connection with his ill-treatment.

  50144/13.

  50144/13.

• EGMR, 31.08.2021 - 42705/11

  ESTEMIROVA v. RUSSIA

  Their conclusions are always formulated as "could" or "could not" (see, for example, Nikolay Fedorov v. Russia, no. 10393/04, § 25, 5 April 2011; Nigmatullin and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 47821/09 and others, § 58, 4 February 2020; and Romanova and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos.