Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MATEVOSYAN v. ARMENIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 52316/09
• EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (13)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  In such circumstances, these costs cannot be claimed, since they have not been actually incurred and this claim must be rejected (see, mutatis mutandis, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 221, Series A no. 324).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  The Court reiterates that where an individual raises an arguable claim that he has been seriously ill-treated by the police or other such agents of the State in breach of Article 3, that provision, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in... [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation (see Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, Reports 1998-VIII, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  The independence of the investigation implies not only the absence of a hierarchical or institutional connection, but also independence in practical terms (see Oğur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 91, ECHR 1999-III; Mehmet Emin Yüksel v. Turkey, no. 40154/98, § 37, 20 July 2004; and also Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 83, Reports 1998-IV, where the public prosecutor investigating the death of a girl during an alleged clash between security forces and the PKK showed a lack of independence as a result of his heavy reliance on information provided by the gendarmes implicated in the incident).

• EGMR, 28.10.1998 - 24760/94

  ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  17153/11 and 29 others, §§ 70 and 71, 25 March 2014; and Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 24760/94, § 85, ECHR 1999-VIII).
• EGMR, 27.05.2003 - 43425/98

  Meinungsfreiheit (konstitutive Bedeutung in der Demokratie; Eingriff; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  Accordingly, the Court finds that in the particular circumstances of the present case, and having in mind that non-exhaustion of domestic remedies cannot be held against the applicant if, in spite of the latter's failure to observe the forms prescribed by law, the competent authority has nevertheless examined the substance of the claim (see Dzhavadov v. Russia, no. 30160/04, § 27, 27 September 2007; Skałka v. Poland (dec.), no. 43425/98, 3 October 2002, and Edelmayer v. Austria (dec.), no. 33979/96, 21 March 2000), the applicant cannot be said to have failed to exhaust the domestic remedies.
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 40094/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 108, 26 January 2006, and Virabyan v. Armenia, no. 40094/05, § 162, 2 October 2012).
• EGMR, 28.04.2015 - 6858/11

  DELIJORGJI v. ALBANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  This rule is neither absolute nor capable of being applied automatically; for the purposes of reviewing whether it has been observed, it is essential to have regard to the circumstances of the individual case (see, among other authorities, Akulinin and Babich, cited above, § 30; Vladimir Fedorov, cited above, § 45; and Delijorgji v. Albania, no. 6858/11, § 54, 28 April 2015).
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 19223/04

  VLADIMIR FEDOROV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  Nevertheless, there may be exceptional circumstances in which such a procedure may be found to have provided an effective remedy in the particular circumstances of a case (see Akulinin and Babich v. Russia, no. 5742/02, §§ 25-34, 2 October 2008; Vladimir Fedorov v. Russia, no. 19223/04, §§ 41-50, 30 July 2009; and Zalyan and Others v. Armenia, nos. 36894/04 and 3521/07, §§ 235-37, 17 March 2016).
• EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 5742/02

  AKULININ AND BABICH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  Nevertheless, there may be exceptional circumstances in which such a procedure may be found to have provided an effective remedy in the particular circumstances of a case (see Akulinin and Babich v. Russia, no. 5742/02, §§ 25-34, 2 October 2008; Vladimir Fedorov v. Russia, no. 19223/04, §§ 41-50, 30 July 2009; and Zalyan and Others v. Armenia, nos. 36894/04 and 3521/07, §§ 235-37, 17 March 2016).
• EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 46559/06

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 52316/09

  46559/06 and 22921/06, § 155, 30 August 2011).
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 30160/04

  DZHAVADOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.03.2015 - 9935/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 01.10.2013 - 57687/09

  SAHAKYAN AND MKRTCHYAN v. ARMENIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 13426/22 (anhängig)

  YETARYAN AND MELKONYAN v. ARMENIA

  Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life and the procedural protection from ill-treatment, was the investigation by the domestic authorities in the present case in breach of the requirements of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention (see Eremiášová and Pechová v. the Czech Republic, no. 23944/04, §§ 130-35, 16 February 2012; Virabyan, §§ 161-79; Nalbandyan v. Armenia, §§ 118-30, both cited above; Matevosyan v. Armenia, no. 52316/09, §§ 72-82, 14 September 2017; and P.H. v. Slovakia, cited above, §§ 99-107)?.