Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07, 9162/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,66415
EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07, 9162/07 (https://dejure.org/2009,66415)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15.12.2009 - 5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07, 9162/07 (https://dejure.org/2009,66415)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Dezember 2009 - 5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07, 9162/07 (https://dejure.org/2009,66415)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,66415) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (17)Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 74153/01

    POPOV v. MOLDOVA (No. 1)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 5958/07
    Moreover, it cannot be excluded that a breach of the confidentiality principle could, in certain circumstances, justify the conclusion that an application is inadmissible on the ground of an abuse of the right of petition (see, inter alia, Hadrabová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 42165/02, 25 September 2007; Popov v. Moldova, (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 48, 18 January 2005).
  • EGMR, 25.09.2007 - 42165/02

    HADRABOVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 5958/07
    Moreover, it cannot be excluded that a breach of the confidentiality principle could, in certain circumstances, justify the conclusion that an application is inadmissible on the ground of an abuse of the right of petition (see, inter alia, Hadrabová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 42165/02, 25 September 2007; Popov v. Moldova, (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 48, 18 January 2005).
  • EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 61164/00

    DURINGER et AUTRES et GRUNGE contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 5958/07
    61164/00 and 18589/02, ECHR 2003-II, as well as Stamoulakatos v. the United Kingdom, no. 27567/95, Commission decision of 9 April 1997; L.R. v. Austria, cited above; X. v. Germany, no. 2724/66, Commission decision of 10 February 1967; X. and Y. v. Germany, no. 2625/65, Commission decision of 30 September 1968, Reports 28, pp.
  • EKMR, 30.09.1968 - 2625/65

    X. et Y. contre la REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 5958/07
    61164/00 and 18589/02, ECHR 2003-II, as well as Stamoulakatos v. the United Kingdom, no. 27567/95, Commission decision of 9 April 1997; L.R. v. Austria, cited above; X. v. Germany, no. 2724/66, Commission decision of 10 February 1967; X. and Y. v. Germany, no. 2625/65, Commission decision of 30 September 1968, Reports 28, pp.
  • EKMR, 10.02.1967 - 2724/66

    X. v. THE GERMANY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 5958/07
    61164/00 and 18589/02, ECHR 2003-II, as well as Stamoulakatos v. the United Kingdom, no. 27567/95, Commission decision of 9 April 1997; L.R. v. Austria, cited above; X. v. Germany, no. 2724/66, Commission decision of 10 February 1967; X. and Y. v. Germany, no. 2625/65, Commission decision of 30 September 1968, Reports 28, pp.
  • EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 18496/16

    ESKERKHANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009; Baucal-Đorđević and Đorđević v. Serbia (dec.), no. 38540/07, 2 July 2013; Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, 2 September 2014; and Ausad Valimised Mtü v. Estonia (dec.), no. 40631/14, 27 September 2016).

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009; Baucal-Đorđević and Đorđević v. Serbia (dec.), no. 38540/07, 2 July 2013; Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, 2 September 2014; and Ausad Valimised Mtü v. Estonia (dec.), no. 40631/14, 27 September 2016; it also refers to Tsonev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 44885/10, § 26, 8 December 2015.

  • EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 1666/19

    Y AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009; Lesnina Veletrgovina DOO v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, (dec.), no. 37619/04, 2 March 2010; Arsovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 30206/06, § 40, 15 January 2013, and Barreau and Others v. France (dec.), no. 24697/09, 13 December 2011).

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009).

  • EGMR, 30.09.2010 - 28369/07

    [ENG]

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009; Hadrabová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 42165/02, 25 September 2007; and Popov v. Moldova, (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 48, 18 January 2005).
  • EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 36609/08

    [ENG]

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009).
  • EGMR, 27.09.2016 - 40631/14

    AUSAD VALIMISED MTU v. ESTONIA

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009; and Abbasov and Others (dec.), cited above, § 29).
  • EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 44885/10

    TSONEV c. BULGARIE

    Cependant, en vertu de sa jurisprudence constante, lorsque les requérants ou leurs avocats révèlent sciemment les détails de la négociation sur un éventuel règlement amiable, la Cour accepte qu'il y a lieu de rejeter la requête pour abus du droit de recours individuel (voir, parmi d'autres, Benjocki et autres c. Serbie (déc.), nos 5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07, 9162/07, 15 décembre 2009 ; Mandil c. France (déc.), no 67037/09, 13 décembre 2011 ; Deceuninck c. France (déc.), no 47447/08, 13 décembre 2011 ; Barreau et autres c. France (déc.), no 24697/09, 13 décembre 2011 ; Abbasov et autres c. Azerbaïdjan (déc.), no 36609/08, 28 mai 2013 ; Gorgadze c. Géorgie (déc.), no 57990/10, 2 septembre 2014).
  • EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 29836/19

    KHMALADZE v. GEORGIA

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009; Baucal-Đorđević and Đorđević v. Serbia (dec.), no. 38540/07, 2 July 2013; Abbasov and Others, § 29, Gorgadze, §§ 19 and 21, Tsonev, § 26, all cited above; Ausad Valimised Mtü v. Estonia (dec.), no. 40631/14, 27 September 2016; and Y and others v. Bulgaria, no. 1666/19, § 25, 8 October 2020).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2017 - 2000/09

    ZÁKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07, 9162/07, 15 December 2009; Deceuninck v. France (dec.), no. 47447/08, 13 December 2011; Barreau and Others v. France (dec.), no. 24697/09, 13 December 2011; Abbasov and Others, cited above; and Gorgadze v. Georgia (dec.), no. 57990/10, 2 September 2014).
  • EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 38540/07

    BAUCAL-DORDEVIC AND DORDEVIC v. SERBIA

    5958/07, 6561/07, 8093/07 and 9162/07, 15 December 2009).
  • EGMR, 17.02.2026 - 54323/22

    NÉMETH v. HUNGARY

    5958/07 and 3 others, 15 December 2009; Abbasov and Others, cited above, § 29, Baucal-Đorđević and Đorđević v. Serbia (dec.), no. 38540/07, § 28, 2 July 2013; and Gorgadze, cited above, § 19).
  • EGMR, 01.04.2025 - 27166/21

    KALANDIA v. GEORGIA

  • EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 54127/16

    PLICHTA v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 02.09.2014 - 57990/10

    GORGADZE v. GEORGIA

  • EGMR, 02.03.2010 - 37619/04

    LESNINA VELETRGOVINA DOO v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  • EGMR, 19.09.2024 - 14025/23

    WEGNEROVÁ AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  • EGMR, 24.05.2018 - 16142/08

    BURLAKOV v. UKRAINE

  • EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 33137/14

    GLAVAS v. CROATIA

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht