Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.N. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Tajikistan);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Uzbekistan);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  A.N. v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications

  Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  However, having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 5 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references).
• EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 59727/13

  AHMED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  A detention period subject to review at regular intervals, as long as expulsion remains a realistic possibility, might be reasonable given the authorities' decisions to maintain that detention awaiting the outcome of this Court's judgment (see Ahmed v. the United Kingdom, no. 59727/13, §§ 45-59, 2 March 2017).
• EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).

• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 14743/11

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  Moreover, the domestic courts' reliance on the assurances of the Tajik and Uzbek authorities, despite their formulation in standard terms, appears tenuous, given that similar assurances have consistently been considered unsatisfactory by the Court in the past (see, for example, Abdulkhakov v. Russia, no. 14743/11, §§ 149-50, 2 October 2012, and Tadzhibayev v. Russia, no. 17724/14, § 46, 1 December 2015).
• EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 17239/13

  MAMAZHONOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  The Court has previously established that the individuals whose extradition was sought by either Uzbek or Tajik authorities on charges of religiously or politically motivated crimes constituted vulnerable groups facing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention in the event of their removal to their respective countries of origin (see Mamazhonov v. Russia, no. 17239/13, § 141, 23 October 2014, and K.I. v. Russia, cited above, § 36).
• EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  AKRAM KARIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014).
• EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 58923/14

  KHOLMURODOV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  The references to the relevant reports by the UN agencies and international NGOs on the situation in Tajikistan were cited in the case of K.I. v. Russia (no. 58182/14, §§ 2-28, 7 November 2017) and on the situation in Uzbekistan in the cases of Kholmurodov v. Russia (no. 58923/14, §§ 46-50, 1 March 2016), and T.M. and Others v. Russia ([Committee], no. 31189/15, § 28, 7 November 2017).
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 58182/14

  K.I. v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  The references to the relevant reports by the UN agencies and international NGOs on the situation in Tajikistan were cited in the case of K.I. v. Russia (no. 58182/14, §§ 2-28, 7 November 2017) and on the situation in Uzbekistan in the cases of Kholmurodov v. Russia (no. 58923/14, §§ 46-50, 1 March 2016), and T.M. and Others v. Russia ([Committee], no. 31189/15, § 28, 7 November 2017).
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 31189/15

  T.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  The references to the relevant reports by the UN agencies and international NGOs on the situation in Tajikistan were cited in the case of K.I. v. Russia (no. 58182/14, §§ 2-28, 7 November 2017) and on the situation in Uzbekistan in the cases of Kholmurodov v. Russia (no. 58923/14, §§ 46-50, 1 March 2016), and T.M. and Others v. Russia ([Committee], no. 31189/15, § 28, 7 November 2017).
• EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 17724/14

  TADZHIBAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16

  Moreover, the domestic courts' reliance on the assurances of the Tajik and Uzbek authorities, despite their formulation in standard terms, appears tenuous, given that similar assurances have consistently been considered unsatisfactory by the Court in the past (see, for example, Abdulkhakov v. Russia, no. 14743/11, §§ 149-50, 2 October 2012, and Tadzhibayev v. Russia, no. 17724/14, § 46, 1 December 2015).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 27584/20

  K.J. AND C.C. v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications

  Rn. 92 K.J. relied on the violations found by the Court in Azimov v. Russia (cited above, §§ 152 and 171-73); Kim v. Russia (no. 44260/13, §§ 41-57, 17 July 2014); and A.N. and Others v. Russia ([Committee], no. 61689/16 and 3 others, § 34, 23 October 2018).
• EGMR, 06.04.2021 - 25079/19

  M.L. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  M.L. relied on the violations that the Court found in Azimov v. Russia (no. 67474/11, §§ 152 and 171-173, 18 April 2013), Kim v. Russia (no. 44260/13, §§ 41-57, 17 July 2014) and A.N. and Others v. Russia [Committee], (no. 61689/16 and 3 others, § 34, 23 October 2018).
• EGMR, 04.02.2020 - 34508/17

  PASTUKHOV v. POLAND

  61689/16, §§ 31-35, 23 October 2018).