Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GÁL v. HUNGARY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GAL v. HUNGARY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (35)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63

  Neumeister ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 62631/11

  The Court notes in particular that in the decision of 16 June 2011 no heed was paid to the applicant's personal circumstances rendering his fleeing implausible, such as his family background (see Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, § 10, Series A no. 8).
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 23541/94

  Recht auf Akteneinsicht bei der Haftprüfung (wesentliche Verfahrensakten; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 62631/11

  Therefore, information which is essential for the assessment of the lawfulness of a detention should be made available in an appropriate manner to the suspect's lawyer" (see Garcia Alva v. Germany, no. 23541/94, § 42, 13 February 2001).
• EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 62631/11

  Continued detention can be justified in a given case only if there are specific indications of a genuine requirement of public interest which, notwithstanding the presumption of innocence, outweighs the rule of respect for individual liberty (see, among other authorities, W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, § 30, Series A no. 254-A).

• KAG Aachen, 19.06.2006 - 11/06

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 62631/11

  11/06/2014.
• EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 12718/87

  CLOOTH v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 62631/11

  It is however necessary, among other conditions, that the danger be a plausible one and the measure appropriate, in the light of the circumstances of the case and in particular the past history and the personality of the person concerned (see Clooth v. Belgium, 12 December 1991, § 40, Series A no. 225; and Paradysz v. France, no. 17020/05, § 71, 29 October 2009).
• EGMR, 06.11.2007 - 8207/06

  STEPULEAC v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 62631/11

  Having regard to its findings below (see paragraphs 44 to 48), the Court considers it unnecessary, in the circumstances of the present case, to address the complaint about the stereotypical reasoning of the orders confirming the applicant's detention in this period (see Mansur v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, § 55, Series A no. 319-B) together with the alleged lack of consideration of his individual circumstances (see Labita v. Italy, cited above, § 152) and of an in-depth analysis of the evidence against him (see Stepuleac v. Moldova, no. 8207/06, § 68, 6 November 2007).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 21763/14

  SZEKERES v. HUNGARY

  In the leading case of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 25.04.2024 - 57470/22

  LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  Rn. 8 In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014 and Lakatos v. Hungary, no. 21786/15, 26 June 2018, the Court already found violations in respect of the undue length of pre-trial detention.

  Rn. 13 Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 25.05.2022 - 33687/21

  FARKAS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014 and Lakatos v. Hungary, no. 21786/15, 26 June 2018, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 32917/20

  BESIROVIC AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014 and Lakatos v. Hungary, no. 21786/15, 26 June 2018, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 22.07.2021 - 40052/20

  GUJDI v. HUNGARY

  In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014 and Lakatos v. Hungary, no. 21786/15, 26 June 2018, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 15.04.2021 - 29343/20

  KEREKES AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014 and Lakatos v. Hungary, no. 21786/15, 26 June 2018, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 37149/18

  PIROS v. HUNGARY

  In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014, and Lakatos v. Hungary, no. 21786/15, 26 June 2018, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 06.02.2020 - 20714/19

  SÜVEGES v. HUNGARY

  In the leading case of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 20.12.2018 - 50153/12

  KUN v. HUNGARY

  In the leading case of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 25.05.2022 - 17701/21

  HANKÓ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

  In the leading cases of Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014 and Lakatos v. Hungary, no. 21786/15, 26 June 2018, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Gál v. Hungary, no. 62631/11, 11 March 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

• EGMR, 26.06.2018 - 21786/15

  LAKATOS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 29.09.2022 - 49178/21

  ALBÓK AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 14.04.2022 - 76862/17

  OROSZ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 14.03.2024 - 53928/22

  KURUCZ AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 19.09.2023 - 1277/22

  LÄHTEENMÄKI v. FINLAND
• EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 41602/17

  D.S. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 31.03.2022 - 21980/21

  BANDER AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 24.02.2022 - 1561/21

  LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 45021/20

  CORNEANU v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 02.12.2021 - 44001/20

  CSIKÓS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 30.09.2021 - 2130/20

  MILÁK AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 50892/19

  ÁBRAHÁM AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 07.03.2019 - 54589/15

  VARGA v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 15717/23

  FORGÁCS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 08.02.2024 - 8318/23

  ZOMBORI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 16.11.2023 - 14047/23

  NAGY v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 45540/20

  BARANYI AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 10.06.2021 - 36653/20

  KÖKÉNY v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 09.04.2020 - 19970/19

  FARKAS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 16.01.2020 - 73341/14

  KOVÁCS AND RAGÁLY v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 20981/21

  INCE AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 30.09.2021 - 43378/20

  GÁBOR AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 19.09.2019 - 29541/15

  MOLNÁR v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 06.03.2025 - 36138/23

  LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
• EGMR, 21.01.2021 - 37739/20

  KOLOMPÁR v. HUNGARY