Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DRUSTVO ZA VARSTVO UPNIKOV v. SLOVENIA

  Inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  DRUSTVO ZA VARSTVO UPNIKOV v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 12 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01

  Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 66433/13

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 requires the State to provide an effective legal remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 98, 8 June 2006).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 45656/99

  CATALDO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 66433/13

  The domestic procedures are also closer and more accessible than the proceedings before the Court and are processed in the applicant's own language, they thus offer an advantage that needs to be taken into account (see Cataldo v. Italy (dec.), no. 45656/99, 3 June 2004, and Zajc and 4 Others v. Slovenia, nos.
• EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 13992/03

  ZAJC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 66433/13

  13992/03, 33814/03, 37190/03, 3088/03 and 38847/04, § 38, 6 May 2008).
• EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 24342/04

  ZUNIC v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 66433/13

  For a detailed presentation of the 2006 Act, see, inter alia, Žunič v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 24342/04, §§ 16-26, 18 October 2007, and Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, §§ 14-15, 16 March 2010.
• EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 10386/03

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.11.2017 - 66433/13

  For a detailed presentation of the 2006 Act, see, inter alia, Žunič v. Slovenia, (dec.) no. 24342/04, §§ 16-26, 18 October 2007, and Žurej v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 10386/03, §§ 14-15, 16 March 2010.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 68445/10

  OLIVEIRA MODESTO AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL

  At the same time, the present case should be distinguished from those in which, instead of acting on their own behalf in judicial proceedings, affected individuals establish a legal entity to do so, a fact which can justify not taking into account the interests of individual members of the association when determining the amount of just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damage caused by the excessive length of civil proceedings (see, a contrario, Društvo Za Varstvo Upnikov v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 66433/13, §§ 54-64, 21 November 2017, where an association, and not individual creditors, brought an action against a company which had failed to meet its contractual obligations).
• EGMR, 22.10.2019 - 20207/16

  PALESCAK v. CROATIA

  The Court reiterates in this connection that a decision or measure favourable to an applicant is not in principle sufficient to deprive him of his status as a "victim" unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, for example, Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 71, ECHR 2006-V; and Društvo za varstvo upnikov v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 66433/13, 21 November 2017).
• EGMR, 06.11.2018 - 34934/14

  RAKOWSKI v. POLAND

  These include not merely the duration of the proceedings in the specific case but the value of the award judged in the light of the standard of living in the State concerned, and the fact that under the national system compensation will in general be awarded and paid more promptly than would be the case if the matter fell to be decided by the Court under Article 41 of the Convention (see Društvo za varstvo upnikov v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 66433/13, 21 November 2017, § 61, and Kalazic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 15382/04, 28 September 2006).