Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RANDELOVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  RANÐELOVIC AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10
• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 66641/10

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (25)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  The Court reiterates that violations have also been found where a trial continued unduly (see Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 151, ECHR 2009, a case where the criminal proceedings at issue had lasted for more than six years and were still pending).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  It also prolongs the ordeal for members of the family (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 86, ECHR 2002-II).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  It must then examine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the applicant did everything that could reasonably be expected of him or her to exhaust domestic remedies (see İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 59, ECHR 2000-VII).

• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94

  HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  While there may be obstacles or difficulties which prevent progress in an investigation in a particular situation, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating an alleged infringement of the right to life may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see Mučibabić, cited above, § 132; see, also, mutatis mutandis, Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 108, 4 May 2001; McCaughey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 43098/09, § 130, ECHR 2013; and Hemsworth v. the United Kingdom, no. 58559/09, § 69, 16 July 2013).
• EGMR, 18.01.2005 - 74153/01

  POPOV v. MOLDOVA (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  In particular, the Court has rejected applications as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if they were knowingly based on untrue facts or misleading information (see Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014; Pirtskhalaishvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 44328/05, 29 April 2010; Khvichia v. Georgia (dec.), no. 26446/06, 23 June 2009; Keretchashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006; and Řehák v. Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004), or if they manifestly lacked any real purpose (see Jovanović v. Serbia (dec.), no. 40348/08, 7 March 2014), or if they contained offensive language (see, for example, Řehák, cited above) or if the principle of confidentiality of friendly-settlement proceedings had been breached (see, for example, Popov v. Moldova (no. 1), no. 74153/01, § 48, 18 January 2005).
• KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11

  Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  21/11/1982.
• KAG Freiburg, 10.12.2010 - 10/09

  Kostentragungspflicht der DCV als Dienstgeber für die durch die Teilnahme an …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  10/09/1944.
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

  TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  Also, it does not consider that a criminal complaint lodged by the eleventh applicant would have been capable of altering to any significant extent the course of the investigation that had been made (see, mutatis mutandis, Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 110 in fine, ECHR 1999-IV).
• KAG Mainz, 18.07.2012 - M 25/12

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  25/12/1960.
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 66641/10

  She relied in this regard on Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria ([GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 111, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 5667/02

  KÉRÉTCHACHVILI c. GEORGIE
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67208/01

  REHÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 47916/99

  MENSON contre le ROYAUME-UNI
• EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97

  BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 73065/01

  BULUT and YAVUZ v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 49790/99

  TRUBNIKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 34661/07

  MUCIBABIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 43098/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 26446/06

  KHVICHIA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 44328/05

  PIRTSKHALAISHVILI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 58559/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 07.03.2014 - 40348/08

  JOVANOVIC v. SERBIA
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 21727/08

  POST v. THE NETHERLANDS

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen