Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 708/13, 796/13, 906/13, 2521/13, 31976/13 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VISAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78
Eckle ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 708/13
However, this general rule might be subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66-70, Series A no. 51, Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003-XI, Sheremetov v. Bulgaria, no. 16880/02, § 33, 22 May 2008 and Nachev v. Bulgaria, no. 27402/05, § 30, 21 December 2010). - EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 40756/06
VLAD AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 27156/02
MORBY contre le LUXEMBOURG
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 708/13
However, this general rule might be subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66-70, Series A no. 51, Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003-XI, Sheremetov v. Bulgaria, no. 16880/02, § 33, 22 May 2008 and Nachev v. Bulgaria, no. 27402/05, § 30, 21 December 2010). - EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 27402/05
NACHEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 708/13
However, this general rule might be subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66-70, Series A no. 51, Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003-XI, Sheremetov v. Bulgaria, no. 16880/02, § 33, 22 May 2008 and Nachev v. Bulgaria, no. 27402/05, § 30, 21 December 2010). - EGMR, 22.05.2008 - 16880/02
SHEREMETOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 708/13
However, this general rule might be subject to an exception when the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 66-70, Series A no. 51, Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003-XI, Sheremetov v. Bulgaria, no. 16880/02, § 33, 22 May 2008 and Nachev v. Bulgaria, no. 27402/05, § 30, 21 December 2010).
- EGMR, 14.09.2015 - 37708/14
OZIMKIEWICZ v. POLAND
The sum referred to above includes PLN 3, 670 (three thousand six hundred seventy Polish zlotys), which is to cover costs and expenses of the proceedings before the domestic courts and which are payable by the applicant to the State Treasury on account of the judgments of the Warsaw Regional Court of 17 January 2013 (case no. XXIV C 1078/11) and the Warsaw Court of Appeal of 16 October 2013 (case no. ACa 708/13).The sum referred to above includes PLN 3, 670 (three thousand six hundred seventy Polish zlotys) which is to cover costs and expenses of the proceedings before the domestic courts and which are payable by the applicant to the State Treasury on account of the judgments of the Warsaw Regional Court of 17 January 2013 (case no. XXIV C 1078/11) and the Warsaw Court of Appeal of 16 October 2013 (case no. ACa 708/13).
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Rechtsprechung
| RG, 04.12.1913 - I 708/13 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Papierfundstellen
- RGSt 48, 46
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".