Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MURADELI v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8 MRK
  No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Expulsion) (Georgia) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MURADELI v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (8)Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 03.10.2014 - 12738/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2015 - 72780/12

  In both contexts regard must be had to the fair balance that has to be struck between the competing interests of the individual and of the community as a whole; and in both contexts the State enjoys a certain margin of appreciation (see Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, § 106, 3 October 2014).
• EGMR, 15.11.2012 - 52873/09

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2015 - 72780/12

  The Government further argued that, by contrast to Shala v. Switzerland, no. 52873/09, § 55, 15 November 2012, the applicant had not arrived in Russia at a young age.
• EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 2607/08

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2015 - 72780/12

  With a reference to Palanci v. Switzerland, no. 2607/08, § 58, 25 March 2014, the Government pointed out that the applicant was unemployed at least until 2009.
• EGMR, 23.03.1999 - 33500/96

  PEJCINOSKI v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.04.2015 - 72780/12

  The Government referred to the Court's jurisprudence to the effect that where immigration is concerned, Article 8 of the Convention cannot be considered to impose on a State a general obligation to respect the choice by married couples of the country of their matrimonial residence and to authorise family reunion in this territory (see Gül v. Switzerland, 19 February 1996, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I, and Pejcinoski v. Austria (dec.), no. 33500/96, 23 March 1999).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 56803/18

  MUNIR JOHANA v. DENMARK

  In Muradeli v. Russia (no. 72780/12, 9 April 2015) the applicant had entered Russia as an adult and started a family there.
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 26957/19

  KHAN v. DENMARK

  In Muradeli v. Russia (no. 72780/12, 9 April 2015) the applicant had entered Russia as an adult and created a family there.
• EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 16870/11

  KAHADAWA ARACHCHIGE v. CYPRUS and 2 other applications

  In accordance with the Court's case-law, decisions taken by States in the sphere of immigration could, in some cases, amount to interference with the right to respect for private and family life where the persons concerned possessed strong personal or family ties in the host country which were liable to be affected by an expulsion order (referring to Z.H. and R.H. v. Switzerland, no. 60119/12, § 41, 8 December 2015, and Muradeli v. Russia, no. 72780/12, § 70, 9 April 2015).

• EGMR, 17.04.2018 - 29790/14

  GULIYEV AND SHEINA v. RUSSIA

  Referring to the case of Muradeli v. Russia (no. 72780/12, § 75, 9 April 2015), the Government argued that the first applicant's family ties in Russia were not strong as the applicants had only registered their marriage and the first applicant's paternity of their children after his expulsion had been ordered.
• EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08

  SAPONDZHYAN v. RUSSIA

  For a summary of the relevant domestic law see Muradeli v. Russia, no. 72780/12, §§ 45-54, 9 April 2015.
• EGMR, 03.09.2019 - 35880/11

  SHERMATOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  For a summary of the relevant domestic law and international materials see Muradeli v. Russia, no. 72780/12, §§ 45-55, 9 April 2015.
• EGMR, 18.09.2018 - 68921/13

  NAMAZOV AND ALEKSEYEVA v. RUSSIA

  For a summary of the relevant domestic law and international materials see Muradeli v. Russia, no. 72780/12, §§ 45-55, 9 April 2015.
• EGMR, 19.05.2020 - 25625/14

  AGADZHANYAN v. RUSSIA

  For a summary of the relevant domestic law and international materials see Muradeli v. Russia, no. 72780/12, §§ 45-55, 9 April 2015.