Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,14536) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAPONDZHYAN v. RUSSIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
SAPONDZHYAN v. RUSSIA
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12313/86
MOUSTAQUIM c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08
However, the expulsion of a person from a country where his or her close relatives reside or have the right to reside may amount to an infringement of the right to respect for family life guaranteed in Article 8 § 1 (see Moustaquim v. Belgium, 18 February 1991, Series A no. 193, § 36). - EGMR, 30.10.1991 - 13163/87
VILVARAJAH ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08
The Court notes that Contracting States have the right, as a matter of well-established international law and subject to their obligations under international treaties, including the Convention, to control the entry, residence and expulsion of aliens (see Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, § 102). - EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 27034/05
Z. et T. c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08
On a number of occasions the Court has stated that relationships between parents and adult children do not fall within the protective scope of Article 8 unless "additional factors of dependence, other than normal emotional ties, are shown to exist" (see, among many other authorities, Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; Konstatinov v. the Netherlands, no. 16351/03, § 52, 26 April 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV; El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010; and F.N v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 3202/09, 17 September 2013).
- EGMR, 26.04.2007 - 16351/03
KONSTATINOV v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08
On a number of occasions the Court has stated that relationships between parents and adult children do not fall within the protective scope of Article 8 unless "additional factors of dependence, other than normal emotional ties, are shown to exist" (see, among many other authorities, Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; Konstatinov v. the Netherlands, no. 16351/03, § 52, 26 April 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV; El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010; and F.N v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 3202/09, 17 September 2013). - EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 39051/03
EMONET ET AUTRES c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08
On a number of occasions the Court has stated that relationships between parents and adult children do not fall within the protective scope of Article 8 unless "additional factors of dependence, other than normal emotional ties, are shown to exist" (see, among many other authorities, Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; Konstatinov v. the Netherlands, no. 16351/03, § 52, 26 April 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV; El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010; and F.N v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 3202/09, 17 September 2013). - EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 46897/07
EL MORABIT v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08
On a number of occasions the Court has stated that relationships between parents and adult children do not fall within the protective scope of Article 8 unless "additional factors of dependence, other than normal emotional ties, are shown to exist" (see, among many other authorities, Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; Konstatinov v. the Netherlands, no. 16351/03, § 52, 26 April 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV; El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010; and F.N v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 3202/09, 17 September 2013). - EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 3202/09
F.N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08
On a number of occasions the Court has stated that relationships between parents and adult children do not fall within the protective scope of Article 8 unless "additional factors of dependence, other than normal emotional ties, are shown to exist" (see, among many other authorities, Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; Konstatinov v. the Netherlands, no. 16351/03, § 52, 26 April 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007-XIV; El Morabit v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 46897/07, 18 May 2010; and F.N v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 3202/09, 17 September 2013). - EGMR, 18.11.2014 - 5049/12
SENCHISHAK v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.03.2017 - 32986/08
Therefore, the existence of "family life" cannot be relied on by applicants in relation to elderly parents, adults who do not belong to the core family, unless the latter have been shown to be dependent on the members of their family (see Slivenko, cited above, § 97, and Senchishak v. Finland, no. 5049/12, § 58, 18 November 2014).
- EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 14918/14
ROZHKANI v. RUSSIA
Referring to the cases of Senchishak v. Finland, no. 5049/12, 18 November 2014, Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321/99, ECHR 2002-II (extracts) and Sapondzhyan v. Russia (dec.), no. 32986/08, 21 March 2017, the Government argued that owing to the applicant's short period of residence with his mother and her lack of dependency on him, she was not a part of his core family. - EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 37115/11
YESHTLA v. THE NETHERLANDS
The Court notes that Y had already come of age when the applicant applied for housing benefit for 2006 and reiterates the Court's well-established case-law in immigration cases that relationships between adult relatives do not fall within the protective scope of Article 8 unless "additional factors of dependence, other than normal emotional ties, are shown to exist" (see, for instance, Z. and T. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27034/05, ECHR 2006-III; Konstatinov v. the Netherlands, no. 16351/03, § 52, 26 April 2007; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, § 35, ECHR 2007 XIV; Senchishak v. Finland, no. 5049/12, § 55, 18 November 2014; Sapondzhyan v. Russia (dec.), no. 32986/08, 21 March 2017 and E.P. v. the Netherlands and A.R. v. the Netherlands (dec.), nos.