Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ALEKSANDR BIKBULATOV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  BIKBULATOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 43149/10

  SMIRNOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 72792/17

  The Court has already established in earlier cases against Russia that, in the absence of any factual elements pointing to the danger posed by the prisoner or to the existence of a security risk, the automatic application of restrictions on family visits (including, but not limited to, refusal of long-term visits to convicted prisoners detained in pre-trial detention facilities, separation of a detainee from his visitors preventing any physical contact between them or presence of a prison guard during visits) cannot be justified as being "necessary in a democratic society" and amounted to a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (see Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, 13 February 2018; Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018; Chaldayev v. Russia, no. 33172/16, 28 May 2019; and Pshibiyev and Berov v. Russia, no. 63748/13, 9 June 2020).
• EGMR, 28.05.2019 - 33172/16

  CHALDAYEV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 72792/17

  The Court has already established in earlier cases against Russia that, in the absence of any factual elements pointing to the danger posed by the prisoner or to the existence of a security risk, the automatic application of restrictions on family visits (including, but not limited to, refusal of long-term visits to convicted prisoners detained in pre-trial detention facilities, separation of a detainee from his visitors preventing any physical contact between them or presence of a prison guard during visits) cannot be justified as being "necessary in a democratic society" and amounted to a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (see Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, 13 February 2018; Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018; Chaldayev v. Russia, no. 33172/16, 28 May 2019; and Pshibiyev and Berov v. Russia, no. 63748/13, 9 June 2020).
• EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 9348/14

  RESIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 72792/17

  The Court has already established in earlier cases against Russia that, in the absence of any factual elements pointing to the danger posed by the prisoner or to the existence of a security risk, the automatic application of restrictions on family visits (including, but not limited to, refusal of long-term visits to convicted prisoners detained in pre-trial detention facilities, separation of a detainee from his visitors preventing any physical contact between them or presence of a prison guard during visits) cannot be justified as being "necessary in a democratic society" and amounted to a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (see Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, 13 February 2018; Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018; Chaldayev v. Russia, no. 33172/16, 28 May 2019; and Pshibiyev and Berov v. Russia, no. 63748/13, 9 June 2020).

• EGMR, 18.02.2020 - 8578/12

  PAVLOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 72792/17

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Pavlova v. Russia, no. 8578/12, §§ 29-33, 18 February 2020.
• EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 63748/13

  PSHIBIYEV ET BEROV c. RUSSIE et 4 autres affaires

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 72792/17

  The Court has already established in earlier cases against Russia that, in the absence of any factual elements pointing to the danger posed by the prisoner or to the existence of a security risk, the automatic application of restrictions on family visits (including, but not limited to, refusal of long-term visits to convicted prisoners detained in pre-trial detention facilities, separation of a detainee from his visitors preventing any physical contact between them or presence of a prison guard during visits) cannot be justified as being "necessary in a democratic society" and amounted to a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (see Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, 13 February 2018; Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018; Chaldayev v. Russia, no. 33172/16, 28 May 2019; and Pshibiyev and Berov v. Russia, no. 63748/13, 9 June 2020).
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 53404/18

  MUKHAMETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 72792/17

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Mukhametov and Others v. Russia, nos. 53404/18 and 3 others, 14 December 2021), as well as to the awards made by the Court in the previous cases brough to it by the applicant (see Aleksandr Bikbulatov v. Russia [Committee], nos. 29894/17 and 83986/17, 21 July 2022), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicant's claims for just satisfaction.
• EGMR, 21.07.2022 - 29894/17

  ALEKSANDR BIKBULATOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.10.2022 - 72792/17

  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Mukhametov and Others v. Russia, nos. 53404/18 and 3 others, 14 December 2021), as well as to the awards made by the Court in the previous cases brough to it by the applicant (see Aleksandr Bikbulatov v. Russia [Committee], nos. 29894/17 and 83986/17, 21 July 2022), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicant's claims for just satisfaction.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 18.02.2020 - 8578/12

  PAVLOVA v. RUSSIA

  The Court has recently received a number of applications concerning the same restrictions on prison visits in the same regional court and the absence of domestic remedies for that grievance (see Ionov and Others v. Russia, no. 34663/17 and 9 Others, communicated on 26 October 2018, and Bikbulatov v. Russia, no. 72792/17, communicated on 10 December 2018).