Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  R.I. v. NORWAY

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  R.I. v. NORWAY

  Art. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 64639/16

  M.L. v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 7692/20

  On several occasions the Court has taken into account whether decisions to replace foster home arrangements with adoptions have been taken in situations where, following a placement in care, only very limited parent-child contact had been allowed (see, for example, Strand Lobben and Others, cited above, § 221; Pedersen and Others v. Norway, no. 39710/15, §§ 67-69, 10 March 2020; M.L. v. Norway, no. 64639/16, § 92, 22 December 2020; and Abdi Ibrahim, cited above, § 152).
• EGMR, 16.07.2002 - 56547/00

  P., C. ET S. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 7692/20

  Rn. 17 In cases such as the present, the Court's focus, moreover, will not principally lie in attempting to untangle the opposed considerations as to whether long-term foster care or adoption was best for X's welfare, but rather, on account of the complexity of the matter that had to be decided by the domestic authorities, in placing particular emphasis on the need to respect the procedural requirements inherent in Article 8 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom, no. 56547/00, §§ 135-36, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 10.03.2020 - 39710/15

  PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 7692/20

  On several occasions the Court has taken into account whether decisions to replace foster home arrangements with adoptions have been taken in situations where, following a placement in care, only very limited parent-child contact had been allowed (see, for example, Strand Lobben and Others, cited above, § 221; Pedersen and Others v. Norway, no. 39710/15, §§ 67-69, 10 March 2020; M.L. v. Norway, no. 64639/16, § 92, 22 December 2020; and Abdi Ibrahim, cited above, § 152).

• EGMR, 19.11.2019 - 64808/16

  K.O. AND v.M. v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 7692/20

  Furthermore, the Court's case-law on cases such as the present may be read in conjunction with its case-law relating to complaints about limitations on parent-child contact imposed during foster care arrangements (see, for example, K.O. and V.M. v. Norway, no. 64808/16, §§ 67-71, 19 November 2019, and A.L. and Others v. Norway, no. 45889/18, §§ 47-51, 20 January 2022).
• EGMR, 20.01.2022 - 45889/18

  A.L. AND OTHERS v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 7692/20

  Furthermore, the Court's case-law on cases such as the present may be read in conjunction with its case-law relating to complaints about limitations on parent-child contact imposed during foster care arrangements (see, for example, K.O. and V.M. v. Norway, no. 64808/16, §§ 67-71, 19 November 2019, and A.L. and Others v. Norway, no. 45889/18, §§ 47-51, 20 January 2022).
• EGMR, 26.04.2018 - 27496/15

  MOHAMED HASAN v. NORWAY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.07.2023 - 7692/20

  The Court also finds that the case differs in other respects from cases such as Strand Lobben and Others, Pedersen and Others, M.L. v. Norway and Abdi Ibrahim (all cited above; contrast, for example, Mohamed Hasan v. Norway, no. 27496/15, §§ 159-63, 26 April 2018).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 30.01.2025 - 63625/19

  MON c. FRANCE

  Concernant les principes généraux applicables, il est en outre renvoyé aux développements de l'arrêt Strand Lobben et autres c. Norvège ([GC], no 37283/13, §§ 202-213, 10 septembre 2019, et pour l'application de ces principes dans des affaires similaires au regard du maintien des liens parents-enfants, voir les décisions de comité du 11 juillet 2023, A.G. c. Norvège, no 14301/19, A.H. c. Norvège, no 39771/19, A.N. c. Norvège, no 12825/20, F.K. c. Norvège, no 51860/19, H.L. c. Norvège, no 59747/19, I.M. c. Norvège, no 16998/20, J.B. et E.M. c. Norvège, no 277/20, M.A. et autres c. Norvège, no 41172/20, R.A. c. Norvège, no 44598/19, R.I. c. Norvège, no 7692/20, R.K. et autres c. Norvège, no 45413/20, T.H. c. Norvège, no 42796/20, et comparer les arrêts de comité du 12 septembre 2023, D.R. et autres c. Norvège, no 63307/17 et 38105/19, K.F. et autres c. Norvège, no 39769/17 et 5 autres, et S.S. et J.H. c. Norvège, no 15784/19).