Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MARDONSHOYEV v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MARDONSHOYEV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 44260/13

  KIM v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  For relevant provisions of the domestic law and practice, see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, §§ 23-25, 17 July 2014.

  The Court has found that the conditions of detention in the Krasnoye Selo facility, as they obtained at least until late 2014, amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, § 34, 17 July 2014, and M.S.A. and Others v. Russia, no. 29957/14 and 8 others, § 58, 12 December 2017).

• EGMR, 15.10.2015 - 40081/14

  Russland verurteilt - Keine Zwangsausweisung nach Syrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).
• EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 67474/11

  AZIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).

• EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12

  AKRAM KARIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).
• EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 50552/13

  RAKHIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).
• EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 34742/13

  EGAMBERDIYEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  40081/14, 40088/14 and 40127/14, §§ 140-42, 15 October 2015; Rakhimov v. Russia, no. 50552/13, §§ 148-50, 10 July 2014; Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 199-204, 28 May 2014; Egamberdiyev v. Russia, no. 34742/13, § 64, 26 June 2014; and Azimov v. Russia, no. 67474/11, § 153, 18 April 2013).
• EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 11556/17

  MAINOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  As regards the subsequent period, the Court has been unable to find indications of a severe overcrowding or any other factors entailing a violation of Article 3 (see Mskhiladze v. Russia, no. 47741/16, §§ 38-39, 13 February 2018, and Mainov v. Russia, no. 11556/17, § 19, 15 May 2018).
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 29957/14

  SHEYKH ALI v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  The Court has found that the conditions of detention in the Krasnoye Selo facility, as they obtained at least until late 2014, amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 3 of the Convention (see Kim v. Russia, no. 44260/13, § 34, 17 July 2014, and M.S.A. and Others v. Russia, no. 29957/14 and 8 others, § 58, 12 December 2017).
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 47741/16

  MSKHILADZE v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  As regards the subsequent period, the Court has been unable to find indications of a severe overcrowding or any other factors entailing a violation of Article 3 (see Mskhiladze v. Russia, no. 47741/16, §§ 38-39, 13 February 2018, and Mainov v. Russia, no. 11556/17, § 19, 15 May 2018).
• EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 43348/13

  CHKHIKVISHVILI v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 8279/16

  The authorities had not asked him to specify such a country or taken any steps to explore that option on their own initiative (contrast Chkhikvishvili v. Russia, no. 43348/13, § 30, 25 October 2016).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 16435/10

  NCHR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

  At the same time, in so far as it has been shown that some expenses such as translation costs have been actually and necessarily incurred by EHRAC on behalf of the first and second applicants and noting that the first applicant has requested that they be reimbursed to EHRAC, the Court awards EUR 850 to be paid to EHRAC (compare Mardonshoyev v. Russia [Committee], no. 8279/16, § 38, 29 January 2019).
• EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 38042/18

  A.K. v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

  It follows from this information provided by the applicant that he had at his disposal at least three square metres of personal space and that overcrowding, or any other aspect of the applicant's detention in those cells, does not appear to have constituted an issue according to the Court's case-law (see, within the context of detention on remand, Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 145, 10 January 2012 and, within the context of detention centre for foreigners, Mainov v. Russia [Committee] no. 11556/17, § 19, 15 May 2018 and Mardonshoyev v. Russia [Committee] no. 8279/16, § 19, 29 January 2019).