Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,16031
EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09 (https://dejure.org/2012,16031)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.02.2012 - 10525/09 (https://dejure.org/2012,16031)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Februar 2012 - 10525/09 (https://dejure.org/2012,16031)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16031) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (8)

  • VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 27.11.2009 - 5/09

    Datenschutzrecht

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
    Eleftherios GRYPAIOS born on 5/09/1931.
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
    The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 22.07.2010 - 12286/08

    [FRE]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
    It notes that the objections and arguments put forward by the Government have been rejected in earlier cases (see Konti-Arvaniti v. Greece, no. 53401/99, §§ 29-30, 10 April 2003 and Tsoukalas v. Greece, no. 12286/08, §§ 37-43, 22 July 2010) and sees no reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case.
  • EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 37683/97

    IAN EDGAR (LIVERPOOL) LIMITED contre le ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
    Hence, their complaint is about a speculative loss of income based on the assumption that their plots of land were not forestal and that they had the right to exploit them without any constraints (see Ian Edgar (Liverpool) Ltd v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 37683/97, ECHR 2000-I).
  • EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 15945/02

    ROUSSAKIS et AUTRES contre la GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
    As regards the fifth applicant, the Court observes that, following judgment no. 3893/2006 of the Supreme Administrative Court, he could have lodged a civil action for damages against the State under sections 104 and 105 of the Introductory Law to the Civil Code, asking for compensation for loss of income due to the designation by the administration of his plot as forest land and consequently the lack of its peaceful enjoyment (see, Roussakis and others v. Greece (dec.), no. 15945/02, 8 January 2004 and Amalia S.A. & Koulouvatos S.A. v. Greece (dec.), no. 20363/02, 28 October 2004).
  • EGMR, 28.10.2004 - 20363/02

    AMALIA S.A. & KOULOUVATOS S.A. c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
    As regards the fifth applicant, the Court observes that, following judgment no. 3893/2006 of the Supreme Administrative Court, he could have lodged a civil action for damages against the State under sections 104 and 105 of the Introductory Law to the Civil Code, asking for compensation for loss of income due to the designation by the administration of his plot as forest land and consequently the lack of its peaceful enjoyment (see, Roussakis and others v. Greece (dec.), no. 15945/02, 8 January 2004 and Amalia S.A. & Koulouvatos S.A. v. Greece (dec.), no. 20363/02, 28 October 2004).
  • EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 10468/04

    ARGYROU ET AUTRES c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 10525/09
    As far as the period to be taken into consideration is concerned, and in particular regarding the dies a quo, the Court reiterates that the Committees for the Settlement of Forest Disputes satisfy both the substantive and procedural requirements of a "tribunal" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 (see Argyrou and Others v. Greece, no. 10468/04, § 31, 15 January 2009).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht