Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55215) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MISIELAK v. POLAND
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (14) Zitiert selbst (20)
- EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 10373/05
MOSKAL AND 29 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
This case and the other cases are based on the same or at least very similar circumstances as in Moskal v. Poland (no. 10373/05, 15 September 2009) and Lewandowski v. Poland (no. 38459/03, 2 October 2012) as regards the revocation of the early retirement pension (the EWK pension) following a review of the applicant's dossier. - EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 29979/04
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
It requires that where an issue pertaining to the general interest is at stake, especially when it affects fundamental human rights, including property rights, the public authorities must act promptly and in an appropriate and above all consistent manner (see Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 120, ECHR 2000-I; Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 128, ECHR 2004-XII; Megadat.com S.r.l. v. Moldova, no. 21151/04, § 72, 8 April 2008; and Rysovskyy v. Ukraine, no. 29979/04, § 71, 20 October 2011). - EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 30614/06
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
As in the Moskal case the Court considers that this interference was provided for by law and pursued a legitimate aim, as required by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see Moskal, cited above, §§ 56, 57 and 61-63 and also Iwaszkiewicz v. Poland, no. 30614/06, §§ 47, 48, 26 July 2011).
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 34386/04
LEW v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
To my regret, I am unable to agree with the majority in this and the other eleven cases (8578/04, 18683/04, 27680/04, 31803/04, 34386/04, 35538/04, 39430/04, 6112/05, 39225/05, 11815/05, 10368/05 and 31492/05) examined simultaneously on the same day by the Court. - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 39430/04
FRACZEK-POTEGA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
To my regret, I am unable to agree with the majority in this and the other eleven cases (8578/04, 18683/04, 27680/04, 31803/04, 34386/04, 35538/04, 39430/04, 6112/05, 39225/05, 11815/05, 10368/05 and 31492/05) examined simultaneously on the same day by the Court. - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 18683/04
POTOK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
To my regret, I am unable to agree with the majority in this and the other eleven cases (8578/04, 18683/04, 27680/04, 31803/04, 34386/04, 35538/04, 39430/04, 6112/05, 39225/05, 11815/05, 10368/05 and 31492/05) examined simultaneously on the same day by the Court. - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 27680/04
ZOFIA SIKORA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
To my regret, I am unable to agree with the majority in this and the other eleven cases (8578/04, 18683/04, 27680/04, 31803/04, 34386/04, 35538/04, 39430/04, 6112/05, 39225/05, 11815/05, 10368/05 and 31492/05) examined simultaneously on the same day by the Court. - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 11815/05
KRZYZEK v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
To my regret, I am unable to agree with the majority in this and the other eleven cases (8578/04, 18683/04, 27680/04, 31803/04, 34386/04, 35538/04, 39430/04, 6112/05, 39225/05, 11815/05, 10368/05 and 31492/05) examined simultaneously on the same day by the Court. - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 6112/05
SASOR v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
To my regret, I am unable to agree with the majority in this and the other eleven cases (8578/04, 18683/04, 27680/04, 31803/04, 34386/04, 35538/04, 39430/04, 6112/05, 39225/05, 11815/05, 10368/05 and 31492/05) examined simultaneously on the same day by the Court. - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 31803/04
FRANCISZEK DABROWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 35538/04
To my regret, I am unable to agree with the majority in this and the other eleven cases (8578/04, 18683/04, 27680/04, 31803/04, 34386/04, 35538/04, 39430/04, 6112/05, 39225/05, 11815/05, 10368/05 and 31492/05) examined simultaneously on the same day by the Court. - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 8578/04
SWIATEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 39225/05
STEPIEN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 31492/05
SZEWC v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 10368/05
MIGALSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …
- EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67208/01
REHÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97
WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 47414/99
SZOTT-MEDYNSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.05.2013 - 13102/02
KOZAK AGAINST POLAND
- EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 10373/05
MOSKAL AND 29 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND
35538/04. - EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 34386/04
LEW v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 39430/04
FRACZEK-POTEGA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 11815/05
KRZYZEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 39225/05
STEPIEN v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 27680/04
ZOFIA SIKORA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 31492/05
SZEWC v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 8578/04
SWIATEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 6112/05
SASOR v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 31803/04
FRANCISZEK DABROWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 10368/05
MIGALSKA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 30361/04
RZEPA v. POLAND
- EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 18683/04
POTOK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 28589/05
KUSINA v. POLAND
dejure.org
Übersicht EGMR
Einloggen | Registrieren
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".
Externe Links öffnen jetzt in einem neuen Tab. Sie können dieses Verhalten auch auf Ihrer Einstellungsseite ändern.