Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  URSAN v. ROMANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of P1-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 35852/04

  By finding a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in the present case, the Court has established the Government's obligation to take appropriate measures to remedy the applicant's individual situation, that is, to ensure compliance with the applicant's enforceable claim under the judgment of 29 October 2004 (compare with Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 142, ECHR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 35852/04

  In particular, if one or more heads of damage cannot be calculated precisely or if the distinction between pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proves difficult, the Court may decide to make a global assessment (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 74826/01

  SHOFMAN CONTRE LA FEDERATION DE RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 35852/04

  In general, it is primarily for the State concerned to choose the means to be used in its domestic legal order in order to discharge its legal obligation under Article 46 of the Convention (see Shofman v. Russia, no. 74826/01, § 53, 24 November 2005, with further references).

• EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 33343/03

  TARVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 35852/04

  Whether this involves reinstating the applicant in her previous job or in an equivalent job or, if this is not possible, granting her reasonable compensation for non-enforcement, or a combination of these and other measures, is a decision that falls to the respondent State (see Tarverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 33343/03, § 66, 26 July 2007).
• EGMR, 11.10.2007 - 9555/03

  STEFANESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 35852/04

  The Court further observes that the applicant has not been reinstated in her previous post, although the domestic authorities have not found, in a definitive manner, that it is impossible to reinstate her (see Stefanescu v. Romania, no. 9555/03, § 25, 11 October 2007).
• EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 20763/03

  NITESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 35852/04

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see, among others, Miclici v. Romania, no. 23657/03, 20 December 2007, and Vasile Nitescu v. Romania, no. 20763/03, 21 April 2009).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.09.2019 - 23878/02

  STRUNGARIU CONTRE LA ROUMANIE ET 11 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  35852/04.
• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 36539/08

  SHMATOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Whether this involves taking measures set out in the judgment, or, if this is not possible, granting them reasonable compensation, or a combination of these and other measures, is a decision that falls to the respondent State (see Tarverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 33343/03, § 66, 26 July 2007, and Ursan v. Romania, no. 35852/04, § 46, 6 April 2010).
• EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3360/03

  CHIS v. ROMANIA

  Whether this involves employing the applicant in the job provided by that judgment or in an equivalent job or, if this is not possible, granting him reasonable compensation for non-enforcement, or a combination of these and other measures, is a decision that falls to the respondent State (see Tarverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 33343/03, § 66, 26 July 2007, and Ursan v. Romania, no. 35852/04, § 46, 6 April 2010).