Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  RASIEWICZ v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Rasiewicz v. Slovenia

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 40445/06

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 for a case to be heard within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 40445/06

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• VK Rheinland-Pfalz, 14.05.2002 - 11/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 40445/06

  11/02/2013.

• EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 32600/05

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 40445/06

  In my separate opinion in Barisic v. Slovenia (32600/05) I have set out the reasons why I cannot accept the Court's current "broad brush" approach to "length of proceedings" claims.
• EGMR, 03.03.2009 - 21415/02

  ROGELJ v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 40445/06

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Hrustelj v. Slovenia, no. 75628/01, §§ 18-20, 30 March 2006; Rogelj v. Slovenia, no. 21415/02, §§ 63-70, 3 March 2009) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 20965/03

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 40445/06

  For relevant domestic law see judgment Ribic v. Slovenia (no. 20965/03, 19 October 2010, § 19).
• EGMR, 30.03.2006 - 75628/01

  HRUSTELJ v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.10.2012 - 40445/06

  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see Hrustelj v. Slovenia, no. 75628/01, §§ 18-20, 30 March 2006; Rogelj v. Slovenia, no. 21415/02, §§ 63-70, 3 March 2009) the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 23032/02

  LUKENDA AND 263 OTHER CASES AGAINST SLOVENIA

  40445/06.