Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOSA v. HUNGARY

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.03.2002 - 43352/98
• EGMR, 01.10.2002 - 43352/98

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2002 - 43352/98

  As regards a complaint that domestic court proceedings have lasted an unreasonably long time, the Court has accepted that the availability of an action in damages may be relevant for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, the aforementioned Vernillo judgment, loc. cit.; Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 159; Gonzalez Marin v. Spain (dec.), no. 39521/98, ECHR 1999-VII; Tomé Mota v. Portugal (dec.), no. 32082/96, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2002 - 43352/98

  The Government rely on the Court's Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991 (Series A no. 200) in support of their submission.
• EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 7604/76

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2002 - 43352/98

  However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after this date, account must be taken of the then state of proceedings (see the Foti and others v. Italy judgment of 10 December 1982, Series A no. 56, p. 18, § 53).

• EGMR, 02.12.1999 - 32082/96

  Überprüfung der Länge eines in Portugal anhängigen Strafverfahrens durch den …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2002 - 43352/98

  As regards a complaint that domestic court proceedings have lasted an unreasonably long time, the Court has accepted that the availability of an action in damages may be relevant for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, the aforementioned Vernillo judgment, loc. cit.; Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 159; Gonzalez Marin v. Spain (dec.), no. 39521/98, ECHR 1999-VII; Tomé Mota v. Portugal (dec.), no. 32082/96, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EGMR, 12.06.2001 - 61166/00

  GIUMMARRA ET AUTRES contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2002 - 43352/98

  The Government have not submitted any precedents illustrating the interpretation of Article 349 by the domestic courts and its practical application to length complaints (cf. Giummarra and others v. France (dec.), no. 61166/00, 12 June 2001).
• EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 23459/94

  HOLZINGER c. AUTRICHE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2002 - 43352/98

  Quite apart from their failure to establish the effectiveness of the remedy provided for under Article 349, the Court further notes that the Government have not referred to the availability of any other domestic procedure which would have allowed the applicant to obtain other forms of redress such as an acceleration of the proceedings when they were still pending (cf. Holzinger v. Austria (No. 1) (preliminary objections), no. 23459/94, §§ 22 to 25, 30 January 2001).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen