Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 14+9 Abs. 1, Art. 35 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 14+9-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion Article 9-2 - Necessary in a democratic society) ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 14+9 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion;Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-2 - Necessary in a democratic society) ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2015, 277

Wird zitiert von ... (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• BVerfG, 22.10.2014 - 2 BvR 661/12

  Vertraglich vereinbarte Loyalitätsobliegenheiten in kirchlichen …

  Sie untersagt über die bereits genannten Gewährleistungsinhalte des Autonomierechts hinaus der staatlichen Gewalt auch, kraft eigener Einschätzung darüber zu befinden, ob religiöse Glaubensüberzeugungen oder die Mittel zum Ausdruck solcher Glaubensüberzeugungen legitim sind (vgl. EGMR, Manoussakis v. Griechenland, Urteil vom 26. September 1996, Nr. 18748/91, § 47; EGMR, Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow u.a. v. Russland, Urteil vom 10. Juni 2010, Nr. 302/02, § 141; EGMR, Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints v. Vereinigtes Königreich, Urteil vom 4. März 2014, Nr. 7552/09, § 29).

  Rn. 142 cc) Im Rahmen der Interessenabwägung hat das staatliche Gericht allerdings stets die konventionsrechtlich geschützte Neutralitätspflicht in religiösen Angelegenheiten zu wahren (vgl. EGMR, Manoussakis v. Griechenland, Urteil vom 26. September 1996, Nr. 18748/91, § 47; EGMR, Jehovah's Witnesses of Moscow u.a. v. Russland, Urteil vom 10. Juni 2010, Nr. 302/02, § 141; EGMR, Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints v. Vereinigtes Königreich, Urteil vom 4. März 2014, Nr. 7552/09, § 29).

• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10

  Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert

  Nevertheless, a State which has created such a status must not only comply with its duty of neutrality and impartiality but must also ensure that religious groups have a fair opportunity to apply for this status and that the criteria established are applied in a nondiscriminatory manner (see, mutatis mutandis, Religionsgemeinschaft der Zeugen Jehovas and Others, cited above, § 92; Savez crkava "Rijec zivota" and Others, cited above, § 85; Ásatrúarfélagid, cited above, § 34; and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552/09, § 34, 4 March 2014).

  This is because, given their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to appreciate what is "in the public interest" (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 46, Series A no. 98; see also, for example, National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 80, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII, and Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552/09, 4 March 2014).

• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10

  TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  It protects the right of believers to meet peacefully in order to worship in the manner prescribed by their religion and also the right to provide, open and maintain places or buildings devoted to religious worship (see The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552/09, § 30, 4 March 2014, and Cumhuriyetçi Egitim ve Kültür Merkezi Vakfi v. Turkey, no. 32093/10, § 41, 2 December 2014).

• EGMR, 05.03.2024 - 64220/19

  Föderation der Aleviten-Gemeinden in Österreich ./. Österreich

  This is because, given their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to appreciate what is "in the public interest" (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 46, Series A no. 98; see also, for example, National and Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 80, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII, and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552/09, 4 March 2014).
• EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 81114/17

  ÁDÁM v. ROMANIA and 5 other applications

  On the other hand, the Court was not convinced that, because of its doctrine concerning worship in its temples, an applicant religious organisation had been in a significantly different position from other churches for the purposes of tax exemptions (see The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552/09, § 31, 4 March 2014).
• EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 32093/10

  [FRE]

  Comme la Cour l'a déjà dit, les questions relatives à l'exploitation des bâtiments religieux, y compris les frais engagés en raison du statut fiscal de ces bâtiments sont, dans certaines circonstances, susceptibles d'avoir des répercussions importantes sur l'exercice du droit des membres de groupes religieux à manifester leurs croyances religieuses (voir, Église de Jésus-Christ des saints des derniers jours c. Royaume-Uni, no 7552/09, § 30, 4 mars 2014, et mutatis mutandis, Association les Témoins de Jéhovah c. France, no 8916/05, §§ 48-54, 30 juin 2011).
• EGMR, 03.09.2019 - 21477/10

  RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF KRYVYI RIH v. UKRAINE

  This is because, given their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to appreciate what is "in the public interest" (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 46, Series A no. 98; see also, for example, National & Provincial Building Society, Leeds Permanent Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, § 80, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII, and Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552/09, 4 March 2014).
• EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 61177/09

  KORKUT ET AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL TURQUIE c. TURQUIE

  En effet, une mesure d'ordre économique, financier ou fiscal prise contre une association peut s'analyser en une violation de l'article 11 de la Convention s'il est démontré que cette mesure a réellement et fortement entravé l'exercice des droits qu'il garantit (voir, mutatis mutandis, Église de Jésus-Christ des saints des derniers jours c. Royaume-Uni, no 7552/09, § 30, 4 mars 2014).
• EGMR, 10.11.2020 - 5301/11

  THE RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES IN BULGARIA v. BULGARIA

  Also, given that Article 9 of the Convention protects the right to provide, open and maintain places or buildings devoted to religious worship, the operation of religious buildings is capable of having an impact on the exercise of the right of members of religious groups to manifest religious belief (see The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. the United Kingdom, no. 7552/09, § 30, 4 March 2014, and Cumhuriyetçi Eğitim ve Kültür Merkezi Vakfı v. Turkey, no. 32093/10, § 41, 2 December 2014).