Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 13521/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,55989) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GRUNER KLUB IM RATHAUS v. AUSTRIA
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74
SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 13521/04
In this regard, the Court refers to its well-established case-law according to which the test of "necessity in a democratic society" requires it to determine whether the "interference" complained of corresponded to a "pressing social need", whether it was proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued and whether the reasons given by the national authorities to justify it are relevant and sufficient (see The Sunday Times v the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 38, § 62). - EGMR, 27.02.2001 - 26958/95
JERUSALEM c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 13521/04
This power of appreciation is not, however, unlimited but goes hand in hand with a European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see, among many other authorities, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII; Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 33, ECHR 2001-II). - EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93
NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 13521/04
This power of appreciation is not, however, unlimited but goes hand in hand with a European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see, among many other authorities, Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII; Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 33, ECHR 2001-II).