Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 42590/21 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,5290) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
M.P.A. v. SPAIN
Inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
PAREJA AMEZCUA v. SPAIN
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 23608/16
PETROV AND X v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 42590/21
The domestic courts must conduct an in-depth examination of the family situation and of a series of factors before making a balanced and reasonable assessment, with a constant concern for determining what would be the best solution for the child (see Petrov and X v. Russia, no. 23608/16, § 98, 23 October 2018, and the case-law cited therein).The margin of appreciation to be accorded to them will vary in accordance with the nature of the issues and the importance of the interests at stake (see Petrov and X v. Russia, no. 23608/16, §§ 98-102, 23 October 2018).
- EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94
Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 02.03.2023 - 42590/21
Alleged violations of Article 8 of the Convention As regards the right to respect for the applicant's family life 8. The general principles concerning the mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other's company as a fundamental element of family life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention have been summarised in Monory v. Romania and Hungary (no. 71099/01, § 70, 5 April 2005); Zorica Jovanovic v. Serbia (no. 21794/08, § 68, ECHR 2013); Kutzner v. Germany (no. 46544/99, § 58, ECHR 2002-I); Elsholz v. Germany [GC] (no. 25735/94, § 43, ECHR 2000-VIII); and K. and T. v. Finland [GC] (no. 25702/94, § 151, ECHR 2001-VII).