Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,53177) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation f Art. 10 (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, § 27; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 49; Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey, nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, §§ 49-50, ECHR 1999-IV, and Fressoz and Roire [GC], cited above,). - EGMR, 24.05.1988 - 10737/84
MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, § 27; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 49; Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey, nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, §§ 49-50, ECHR 1999-IV, and Fressoz and Roire [GC], cited above,). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95
FRESSOZ ET ROIRE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00
In the light of the above, the Court concludes that the applicants" complaint under Article 10 of the Convention was thus brought, at least in substance, to the attention of the domestic courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §§ 36-39, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94
Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, § 27; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 49; Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey, nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, §§ 49-50, ECHR 1999-IV, and Fressoz and Roire [GC], cited above,). - EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23168/94
KARATAS c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00
The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, § 27; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 49; Baskaya and OkçuoÄ?lu v. Turkey, nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, §§ 49-50, ECHR 1999-IV, and Fressoz and Roire [GC], cited above,).
- EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 17526/10
GÜLCÜ v. TURKEY
The Court further reiterates that the nature and severity of the penalties imposed are also factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of the interference (see, mutatis mutandis, Baskaya and Okçuoglu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Kar and Others v. Turkey, no. 58756/00, § 48, 3 May 2007; and Murat Vural v. Turkey, no. 9540/07, § 64, 21 October 2014). - EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 53047/99
BIRDAL v. TURKEY
In the light of the above, the Court concludes that the applicant's complaint under Article 10 of the Convention was thus brought, at least in substance, to the attention of the domestic courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §§ 36-39, ECHR 1999-I and Kar and Others v. Turkey, no. 58756/00, §§ 35-38, 3 May 2007).