Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.02.2021 - 68188/13 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2021,1221) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VOROTNIKOVA v. LATVIA
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
VOROT?...IKOVA v. LATVIA
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 20.07.2001 - 30882/96
PELLEGRINI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2021 - 68188/13
What is particularly at stake is applicants" confidence in the workings of justice, which is based on, inter alia, the assumption that they are afforded the opportunity to express their views on every document in the case file (see Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882/96, § 45, ECHR 2001-VIII; Zagrebacka banka d.d. v. Croatia, no. 39544/05, § 203, 12 December 2013; and Juricic v. Croatia, no. 58222/09, § 75, 26 July 2011). - EGMR, 03.03.2000 - 35376/97
KRCMAR AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2021 - 68188/13
This means that parties to proceedings must have the opportunity to familiarise themselves with the evidence before the court, as well as the opportunity to comment on its existence, contents and authenticity in an appropriate form and within an appropriate time, if need be, in writing and in advance (see Krcmár and Others v. the Czech Republic, no. 35376/97, § 42, 3 March 2000, and Colloredo Mannsfeld v. the Czech Republic, nos. - EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 25053/05
FERREIRA ALVES c. PORTUGAL (N° 3)
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.02.2021 - 68188/13
The right to adversarial proceedings entails parties" right to have knowledge of and comment on all evidence adduced or observations filed with a view to influencing the court's decision (see, amongst other authorities, Kress v. France [GC], no. 39594/98, §§ 65 and 74, ECHR 2001-VI; Ferreira Alves v. Portugal (no. 3), no. 25053/05, §§ 37-38, 21 June 2007; and K.D.B. v. the Netherlands, 27 March 1998, § 43, Reports 1998-II).