Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HODZIC v. SLOVENIA

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 3461/08

  46113/99 et al., § 69, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 11138/10

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 3461/08

  States do not have to answer before an international body for their acts before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system, and those who wish to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court as concerns complaints against a State are thus obliged to use first the remedies provided by the national legal system (see Vuckovic and Others, cited above, § 70, and Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 11138/10, § 115, ECHR 2016).
• EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01

  BRUSCO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 3461/08

  However, the Court points out that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 71; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; and Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 84, 3 May 2007).
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 26867/02

  GRZINCIC c. SLOVENIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 3461/08

  However, the Court points out that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 71; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; and Grzincic v. Slovenia, no. 26867/02, § 84, 3 May 2007).
• EGMR, 18.10.2016 - 65020/13

  ANASTASOV AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2017 - 3461/08

  The Court has held on a number of occasions that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, a wider margin of appreciation should be left to the domestic authorities in respect of the implementation of a pilot judgment (see Kuric and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828/06, § 141, ECHR 2014, Anastasov and Others v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 65020/13, § 71, 18 October 2016, and the authorities cited therein; see also Alisic and Others, cited above, §§ 106-107).

• EGMR, 14.11.2017 - 5433/17

  DOMJÁN v. HUNGARY

  Such an assessment should be carried out in a manner consistent with their own legal system and traditions and take into account the standard of living in the country concerned, even if that results in awards of amounts that are lower than those fixed by the Court in similar cases (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 80, ECHR 2006-V; Kuric and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828/06, § 141, ECHR 2014; Bizjak v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 25516/12, § 39, 8 July 2014; Anastasov and Others v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 65020/13, § 71, 18 October 2016; and Hodzic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 3461/08, § 13, 4 April 2017).
• EGMR, 17.03.2020 - 29026/06

  BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  27451/09 and 60650/09, 23 September 2010 concerning the non-enforcement of judgments; Stella and 10 Other applications v. Italy (dec.), no. 49169/09, 16 September 2014, and Latak v. Poland (dec.), no. 52070/08, 12 October 2010 concerning prison overcrowding; Techniki Olympiaki A.E. v. Greece (dec.), no. 40547/10, 1 October 2013; Balakchiev and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 65187/10, 18 June 2013, and Müdür Turgut and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013 concerning the length of proceedings; and Hodzic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 3461/08, 4 April 2017 concerning "old" foreign-currency savings).
• EGMR, 21.03.2023 - 54421/21

  SZAXON v. HUNGARY

  Such an assessment should be carried out in a manner consistent with their own legal system and traditions and take into account the standard of living in the country concerned - even if that results in awards of amounts that are lower than those fixed by the Court in similar cases (see Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 80, ECHR 2006-V; Xynos v. Greece, no. 30226/09, § 41, 9 October 2014 and, mutatis mutandis, Kuric and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828/06, § 141, ECHR 2014; Anastasov and Others v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 65020/13, § 71, 18 October 2016;and Hod?¾ic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 3461/08, § 13, 4 April 2017).
• EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 42670/16

  ZIVKOVIC AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA

  However, the Court points out that the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 71; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX; Bizjak v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 25516/12, § 42, 8 July 2014; and Hodzic v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 3461/08, § 18, 4 April 2017).