Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 32365/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,41449) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80
ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 32365/96
The Contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a different treatment in law (see, amongst many authorities, the Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, pp. 35-36). - EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 12083/86
BELDJOUDI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 32365/96
However, their decisions in this domain must, in so far as they may interfere with a right protected under paragraph 1 of Article 8, be necessary in a democratic society, that is to say, justified by a pressing social need and, in particular, proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see, among other authorities, the following judgments: Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-A, p. 27, § 74; Nasri v. France, 13 July 1995, Series A no. 320-B, p. 25, § 41; Boughanemi v. France, 24 April 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 II, Vol. 8, pp. 609-610, 41; and C. v. Belgium, 7 August 1996, Reports 1996-III, Vol. 12, p. 924, § 31). - EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 19465/92
NASRI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 32365/96
However, their decisions in this domain must, in so far as they may interfere with a right protected under paragraph 1 of Article 8, be necessary in a democratic society, that is to say, justified by a pressing social need and, in particular, proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see, among other authorities, the following judgments: Beldjoudi v. France, 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-A, p. 27, § 74; Nasri v. France, 13 July 1995, Series A no. 320-B, p. 25, § 41; Boughanemi v. France, 24 April 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 II, Vol. 8, pp. 609-610, 41; and C. v. Belgium, 7 August 1996, Reports 1996-III, Vol. 12, p. 924, § 31).