Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VOMOCIL AND ART 38, A.S. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Art. 13, Art. 13+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• BVerwG, 14.06.2006 - 3 C 18.05

  Vermögenszuordnung; öffentliche Restitution; rechtsstaatswidriger Erwerb; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 38817/04

  Tábor District Court's decision no. 3 C 18/2005 of 21 April 2005 and Ceské Budejovice Regional Court's decision no. 15 Co 456/2005 of 8 August 2005.
• EGMR, 24.04.1990 - 11801/85

  KRUSLIN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 38817/04

  As no statute providing for controlled rents had been enacted after Constitutional Court judgment no. 84/2003 and the ordinary courts had failed to provide landlords with any remedy in respect of controlled rents, the Constitutional Court, with reference to the case-law of the Court (Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A) and to the principle of non-interference with property rights other than on a statutory basis, reiterated its intention to apply the principles enshrined in its previous judgments in individual cases until the existing vacuum legis was filled.
• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 50389/99

  DORAN v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 38817/04

  It is true that the effectiveness of a remedy can be undermined by its excessive duration (see, inter alia, Doran v. Ireland, no. 50389/99, § 57, ECHR 2003-X (extracts); and Golha v. the Czech Republic, no. 7051/06, § 49, 26 May 2011).

 
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 38817/04

  In this way, it is an important aspect of the principle that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights (see McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 112, 10 September 2010; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI; and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 38817/04

  However, the existence of mere doubts as to the prospects of success of a particular remedy which is not obviously futile, is not a valid reason for failing to exhaust domestic remedies (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 70, 17 September 2009).
• EGMR, 26.05.1994 - 16969/90

  KEEGAN v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 38817/04

  An applicant cannot be regarded as having failed to exhaust domestic remedies if he or she can show, by providing relevant domestic case-law or any other suitable evidence, that an available remedy which he or she has not used was bound to fail or had a negligible prospect of success in pursuing it (see, inter alia, Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 156, ECHR 2003-VI; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 73, Reports 1996-IV; and Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 39, Series A no. 290).
• EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 39343/98

  KLEYN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 38817/04

  An applicant cannot be regarded as having failed to exhaust domestic remedies if he or she can show, by providing relevant domestic case-law or any other suitable evidence, that an available remedy which he or she has not used was bound to fail or had a negligible prospect of success in pursuing it (see, inter alia, Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 156, ECHR 2003-VI; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 73, Reports 1996-IV; and Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 39, Series A no. 290).

• EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 663/11

  NEDYALKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  38817/04 and 1458/07, § 47, 5 March 2013).
• EGMR, 28.05.2013 - 5044/04

  SVOBODEN ZHELEZNICHARSKI SINDIKAT 'PROMYANA' v. BULGARIA

  38817/04 and 1458/07, § 47, 5 March 2013).