Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LIU v. POLAND

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Russia);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Extradition);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ...

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• lto.de (Kurzinformation)

  Polen darf Häftling nicht nach China ausliefern

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LIU v. POLAND

  Art. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 1, Art. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2023, 1149

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR - 49975/15 (anhängig)

  RAKHMANOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 37610/18

  The relevant general principles concerning the application of Article 3 within the context of extradition and expulsion have been summarised by the Court in the judgments F.G. v. Sweden ([GC], no. 43611/11, §§ 111-27, ECHR 2016), J.K. and Others v. Sweden ([GC], no. 59166/12, §§ 77-105, ECHR 2016) and, more recently, Khasanov and Rakhmanov v. Russia ([GC], nos. 28492/15 and 49975/15, §§ 93-116, 29 April 2022).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 22426/10

  KESHMIRI v. TURKEY (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 37610/18

  On the one hand, the application of an interim measure by the Court does not necessarily entail detention, which can be applied only in strict compliance with domestic law and after considering alternative solutions (see Keshmiri v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 22426/10, § 34, 17 January 2012, and Al Husin, cited above, § 68).
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 11209/10

  RUSTAMOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.10.2022 - 37610/18

  To avoid being branded as arbitrary, detention under Article 5 § 1 (f) must be carried out in good faith; it must be closely connected to the ground of detention relied on by the Government; the place and conditions of detention should be appropriate; and the length of the detention should not exceed that reasonably required for the purpose pursued (see Rustamov v. Russia, no. 11209/10, § 150, 3 July 2012, and Al Husin v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 2), no. 10112/16, § 97, 25 June 2019).

• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 37726/21

  COMPAORÉ c. FRANCE

  La Cour n'adopterait une telle approche que dans les cas de violence générale les plus extrêmes où l'intéressé courrait un risque réel de subir des mauvais traitements du seul fait que son retour dans le pays en question l'exposerait à cette violence (Sufi et Elmi, précité, § 218, Khasanov et Rakhmanov, précité, § 96, et Liu c. Pologne, no 37610/18, § 66, 6 octobre 2022).