Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FREZADOU v. GREECE

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  FREZADOU v. GREECE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12
• EGMR, 05.02.2020 - 2683/12

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 17851/91

  Radikalenerlaß

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12

  The Court observes that neither Article 6 nor any other provision of the Convention or its Protocols guarantees, as such, a right to appointment or promotion in the civil service (see Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, §§ 48-49, Series A no. 104; Kosiek v. Germany, 28 August 1986, §§ 34-35, Series A no. 105; Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 43, Series A no. 323; and Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, §§ 40-41, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 04.12.2015 - 47143/06

  EGMR verurteilt Russland wegen geheimer Telefonüberwachung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12

  However, it reiterates that its task is not normally to review the relevant law and practice in abstracto, but to determine whether the manner in which they were applied to, or affected, the applicant gave rise to a violation of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, § 164, ECHR 2015, and N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952/94, § 56, ECHR 2002-X).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12

  The combination of all these safeguards makes up the right to a fair trial secured by Article 6 § 1 (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18).

 
• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 28396/95

  Nichtberufung eines liechtensteiner Richters in das Amt des Gerichtspräsidenten …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12

  The Court observes that neither Article 6 nor any other provision of the Convention or its Protocols guarantees, as such, a right to appointment or promotion in the civil service (see Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, §§ 48-49, Series A no. 104; Kosiek v. Germany, 28 August 1986, §§ 34-35, Series A no. 105; Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 43, Series A no. 323; and Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, §§ 40-41, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96

  ROCHE c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12

  Article 6 § 1 does not guarantee any particular content for (civil) "rights and obligations" in the substantive law of the Contracting States: the Court may not create by way of interpretation of Article 6 § 1 a substantive right which has no legal basis in the State concerned (see, for example, Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 119, ECHR 2005-X, and Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, § 91, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 26.06.1986 - 8543/79

  VAN MARLE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12

  Furthermore, in some cases, national law, while not necessarily recognising that an individual has a subjective right, does confer the right to a lawful procedure for examination of his or her claim, involving matters such as ruling whether a decision was arbitrary or ultra vires or whether there were procedural irregularities (see Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, 26 June 1986, § 35, Series A no. 101, and, mutatis mutandis, Kök v. Turkey, no. 1855/02, § 36, 19 October 2006).
• EGMR, 28.08.1986 - 9228/80

  GLASENAPP c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12

  The Court observes that neither Article 6 nor any other provision of the Convention or its Protocols guarantees, as such, a right to appointment or promotion in the civil service (see Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, §§ 48-49, Series A no. 104; Kosiek v. Germany, 28 August 1986, §§ 34-35, Series A no. 105; Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 43, Series A no. 323; and Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, §§ 40-41, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 28.08.1986 - 9704/82

  KOSIEK c. ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12

  The Court observes that neither Article 6 nor any other provision of the Convention or its Protocols guarantees, as such, a right to appointment or promotion in the civil service (see Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, §§ 48-49, Series A no. 104; Kosiek v. Germany, 28 August 1986, §§ 34-35, Series A no. 105; Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 43, Series A no. 323; and Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, §§ 40-41, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 9125/07

  PENTTINEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2018 - 2683/12

  The Court has, however, accepted, in circumstances similar to those of the present case, that the right to a lawful and fair promotion procedure (see Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova, cited above, § 43, Fiume, cited above, § 35, and Penttinen v. Finland (dec.), no 9125/07, 5 January 2010) or to equal participation in a competition for public office (Juricic, cited above, § 52) could be considered as recognised rights in domestic law, at least arguably where the domestic courts had recognised their existence and had examined the relevant complaints of the applicants (see Tsanova-Gecheva, cited above, § 84).