Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 74729/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,30587) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AYUSO TORRES v. SPAIN
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-b) No significant disadvantage;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
AYUSO TORRES v. SPAIN
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23556/94
CEYLAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 74729/17
The Court recalls that there is little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on debate on matters of public interest (see Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 39311/05
KARAKO v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 74729/17
In any event, the Court reiterates that, where more than one potentially effective remedy is available, the applicant is only required to have made use of one of them, it being for the applicant to select the one which is most appropriate in his or her case (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III; O'Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, §§ 110-11, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Karakó v. Hungary, no. 39311/05, § 14, 28 April 2009).