Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WULFF v. DENMARK

  Art. 8 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 58757/00

  JÄGGI c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 35016/07

  This includes obtaining information necessary to discover the truth concerning important aspects of one's personal identity, such as the identity of one's parents (see Phinikaridou v. Cyprus, no. 23890/02, ECHR 2007-XIV (extracts); Jäggi v. Switzerland, no. 58757/00, § 25, ECHR 2006-...; and Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 29, ECHR 2003-III).
• EGMR, 27.10.1994 - 18535/91

  KROON AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 35016/07

  The Court reiterates that the States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in this connection (see, inter alia, Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 31, Series A no. 297-C and Shofman v. Russia, cited above § 34) and that it is not the Court's task to substitute itself for the competent domestic authorities.
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10454/83

  GASKIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 35016/07

  The Court reiterates that respect for private life requires that everyone should be able to establish details of their identity as individual human beings and that an individual's entitlement to such information is of importance because of its formative implications for his or her personality (see, for example, Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, §§ 53-54, ECHR 2002-I, and Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160, p. 16, §§ 36-37, 39).

 
• EGMR, 28.11.1984 - 8777/79

  RASMUSSEN v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 35016/07

  In respect of paternity proceedings, the Court has previously accepted that the introduction of a time-limit or other limitations on the institution of such is justified by the desire to ensure legal certainty and finality in family relations and to protect the interests of the child (see, for example, Phinikaridou v. Cyprus, (cited above) § 51; Mizzi v. Malta, no. 26111/02, § 88, ECHR 2006-I (extracts) and Rasmussen v. Denmark, 28 November 1984, § 41, Series A no. 87).
• EGMR, 29.06.1999 - 27110/95

  NYLUND contre la FINLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 35016/07

  In such circumstances, it may be justifiable for the domestic courts to give greater weight to the interests of the child than to the interests of a putative father in obtaining determination of a biological fact (see, inter alia, Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no. 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI and Yildirim v. Austria (dec.), no. 34308/96, 19 October 1999).
• EGMR, 19.10.1999 - 34308/96

  YILDIRIM v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 35016/07

  In such circumstances, it may be justifiable for the domestic courts to give greater weight to the interests of the child than to the interests of a putative father in obtaining determination of a biological fact (see, inter alia, Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no. 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI and Yildirim v. Austria (dec.), no. 34308/96, 19 October 1999).

• EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 28609/08

  A.L. v. POLAND

  The Court has acknowledged the importance of the protection of legal certainty and finality of family relations (see, Rasmussen, cited above, § 41; mutatis mutandis, Mizzi v. Malta, no. 26111/02, § 88, ECHR 2006-I (extracts); Paulík, cited above, § 44; Phinikaridou v. Cyprus, no. 23890/02, § 51, 20 December 2007; and Wulff v. Denmark (dec.), no. 35016/07, 9 March 2010).
• EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 54056/15

  KORDEK v. POLAND

  The Court has acknowledged the importance of the protection of legal certainty and finality in family relations (see Paulík v. Slovakia, no. 10699/05, § 44, ECHR 2006-XI (extracts), and Wulff v. Denmark (dec.), no. 35016/07, 9 March 2010).