Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 39468/09   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2016,12209
EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 39468/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,12209)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10.05.2016 - 39468/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,12209)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10. Mai 2016 - 39468/09 (https://dejure.org/2016,12209)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,12209) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 48183/99
    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 39468/09
    In their absence, the criminal proceedings had not been stayed, unlike in Smirnova v. Russia (nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 35, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts)); Yeloyev v. Ukraine (no. 17283/02, §§ 14-15, 6 November 2008); and Girolami v. Italy (19 February 1991, § 9, Series A no. 196-E).

    According to the settled case-law of the Court, an accused person cannot rely on a period of being a fugitive when he was seeking to avoid being brought to justice in his home country (see, for example, Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 84, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts), and Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283/02, § 70, 6 November 2008, where the periods when the applicants had absconded were excluded from the overall length of the proceedings).

  • EGMR, 21.09.2017 - 40107/02

    KHARCHENKO CONTRE L'UKRAINE ET 35 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 39468/09
    In their absence, the criminal proceedings had not been stayed, unlike in Smirnova v. Russia (nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 35, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts)); Yeloyev v. Ukraine (no. 17283/02, §§ 14-15, 6 November 2008); and Girolami v. Italy (19 February 1991, § 9, Series A no. 196-E).

    According to the settled case-law of the Court, an accused person cannot rely on a period of being a fugitive when he was seeking to avoid being brought to justice in his home country (see, for example, Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 84, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts), and Yeloyev v. Ukraine, no. 17283/02, § 70, 6 November 2008, where the periods when the applicants had absconded were excluded from the overall length of the proceedings).

  • EGMR, 27.08.2015 - 46470/11

    PARRILLO v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 39468/09
    The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain, not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness: it falls to the respondent State to establish that those conditions are satisfied (see, most recently, Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470/11, § 87, ECHR 2015, and Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia [GC], no. 17153/11, §§ 69-77, 25 March 2014).
  • EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 1206/03

    UYSAL AND OSAL v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 39468/09
    When an accused person flees from a State which respects the principle of the rule of law, it may be assumed that he or she is not entitled to complain of the proceedings being of an unreasonable duration following that flight, unless sufficient reason can be shown to rebut that assumption (see Vayiç v. Turkey, no. 18078/02, § 44, ECHR 2006-VIII (extracts); Uysal and Osal v. Turkey, no. 1206/03, § 30, 13 December 2007; and Ventura v. Italy, no. 7438/76, Commission's report of 15 December 1980, Decisions and Reports (DR) 23, p. 91, § 197).
  • EKMR, 09.03.1978 - 7438/76

    VENTURA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 39468/09
    When an accused person flees from a State which respects the principle of the rule of law, it may be assumed that he or she is not entitled to complain of the proceedings being of an unreasonable duration following that flight, unless sufficient reason can be shown to rebut that assumption (see Vayiç v. Turkey, no. 18078/02, § 44, ECHR 2006-VIII (extracts); Uysal and Osal v. Turkey, no. 1206/03, § 30, 13 December 2007; and Ventura v. Italy, no. 7438/76, Commission's report of 15 December 1980, Decisions and Reports (DR) 23, p. 91, § 197).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht