Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 39806/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,43963) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PALADI v. MOLDOVA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 34, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Preliminary objections dismissed Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 5-3 and 5-4 Violation of Art. 34 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial ...
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 39806/05
- EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 39806/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 12.04.2005 - 36378/02
CHAMAÏEV ET AUTRES c. GEORGIE ET RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 39806/05
A violation of that Article was found in the Mamatkulov case itself, as it was in subsequent cases which similarly involved the expulsion or extradition of an applicant in disregard of the terms of interim measures applied by the Court under Rule 39 to protect the applicant against the risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 2 or 3 in the receiving country (see, for example, Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, judgment of 12 April 2005, no. 36378/02, ECHR 2005- ; Olaechea Cahuas v. Spain, judgment of 10 August 2006 no. 24668/03, ECHR, 2006- ). - EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 24668/03
OLAECHEA CAHUAS v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 39806/05
A violation of that Article was found in the Mamatkulov case itself, as it was in subsequent cases which similarly involved the expulsion or extradition of an applicant in disregard of the terms of interim measures applied by the Court under Rule 39 to protect the applicant against the risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 2 or 3 in the receiving country (see, for example, Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, judgment of 12 April 2005, no. 36378/02, ECHR 2005- ; Olaechea Cahuas v. Spain, judgment of 10 August 2006 no. 24668/03, ECHR, 2006- ). - EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 60115/00
Meinungsfreiheit von Rechtsanwälten bei der öffentlichen Kritik von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 39806/05
The Court recalls that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41 of the Convention, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Amihalachioaie v. Moldova, no. 60115/00, § 47, ECHR 2004-III). - EGMR, 04.10.2006 - 76642/01
ASSOCIATION SOS ATTENTATS ET DE BOERY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 39806/05
The Court recalls that "in order to conclude in the instant case that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) and that there is therefore no longer any objective justification for the applicant to pursue his application, it is necessary to examine, firstly, whether the circumstances complained of directly by the applicants still obtain and, secondly, whether the effects of a possible violation of the Convention on account of those circumstances have also been redressed" (see Association SOS Attentats and de Boery v. France [GC], (dec.), no. 76642/01, § 32, ECHR 2006-...).