Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KAYUMOVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Violation of Article 14+8-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KAYUMOVY v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 29.11.2002 - 4/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  The first applicant was detained in different remand prisons between 04/02/2015 and 22/10/2020 without long-term family visits.

  Second Appellate Court of General Jurisdiction on 04/02/2021;.

• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 43149/10

  ANDREY SMIRNOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  In the leading cases of Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, §§ 35-57, 13 February 2018, Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018, Chaldayev v. Russia, no. 33172/16, 28 May 2019, Pshibiyev and Berov v. Russia, no. 63748/13, 9 June 2020, and Mukhametov and Others v. Russia, nos.

  43149/10,.

• KAG Mainz, 03.11.2011 - M 17/11

  Beteiligung bei Versetzung

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  17/11/2020.

 
• EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 19/05

  LAUDETTE c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  (2) detention order of 25/03/2021, by the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court; appeal decision by the Fifth Appellate Court on 19/05/2021, (appeal lodged on 29/03/2021);.
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 18/03

  VANZHULA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  RAK Stuttgart; 02.07.2002; 11/02|BKartA; 13.02.2003; B 11/02|VK Rheinland-Pfalz; 14.05.2002; 11/02|EVG; 10.03.2003; U 11/02|EVG; 22.07.2003; P 11/02|EVG; 22.04.2002; I 11/02|EVG; 17.05.2002; H 11/02|EVG; 22.03.2004; C 11/02|EVG; 18.09.2002; B 11/02">11/02/2021, upheld by the First Appellate Court on 18/03/2021;.
• RG, 05.06.1905 - 27/05

  1. Unter welchen Voraussetzungen erfüllt das Entgehen eines Gewinnes im …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  27/05/2021.
• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03

  IDALOV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08 and 154-58, 22 May 2012, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and lengthy review of detention; Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards placement in a metal cage during court hearings; Pavlova v. Russia, no. 8578/12, §§ 29-33, 18 February 2020, as regards the lack of an effective remedy in respect of the complaint about restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities, Chaldayev, cited above, §§ 69-83, related to discriminatory treatment as regards family visits in pre-trial detention facilities; and Alekhin v. Russia, no. 10638/08, §§ 146-55, 30 July 2009, regarding the lack of compensation in relation to a delay in examination of an appeal against an extension detention order).
• EGMR - 43441/08 (anhängig)

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 103-08 and 154-58, 22 May 2012, concerning inadequate conditions of transport and lengthy review of detention; Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), as regards placement in a metal cage during court hearings; Pavlova v. Russia, no. 8578/12, §§ 29-33, 18 February 2020, as regards the lack of an effective remedy in respect of the complaint about restrictions on family visits in pre-trial detention facilities, Chaldayev, cited above, §§ 69-83, related to discriminatory treatment as regards family visits in pre-trial detention facilities; and Alekhin v. Russia, no. 10638/08, §§ 146-55, 30 July 2009, regarding the lack of compensation in relation to a delay in examination of an appeal against an extension detention order).
• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 19/11

  LANG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND HASTIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  19/11/2018.
• EGMR, 26.03.2019 - 10597/13

  VALYUZHENICH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 56727/18

  In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the complaints lodged by some applicants under Article 13 of the Convention about the lack of effective domestic remedies to complain about the placement in a metal cage in courtrooms and the remaining complaints under Article 5 § 5 of the Convention (compare Valyuzhenich v. Russia, no. 10597/13, § 27, 26 March 2019).
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 44363/14

  IVANOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 26895/14

  PUZANOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.05.2019 - 33172/16

  CHALDAYEV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 09.06.2020 - 63748/13

  PSHIBIYEV ET BEROV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 18.02.2020 - 8578/12

  PAVLOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.12.2018 - 9348/14

  RESIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 10638/08

  ALEKHIN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 53404/18

  MUKHAMETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA