Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 29078/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,22413) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
LASZCZAK v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73
König ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 29078/07
Regarding the question of the beginning of the proceedings, the Court notes that when under the national legislation an applicant has to exhaust a preliminary administrative procedure before having recourse to a court, the proceedings before the administrative body are to be included when calculating the length of the civil proceedings for the purposes of Article 6 (see König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98, Series A no. 27; Schouten and Meldrum v. the Netherlands, 9 December 1994, § 62, Series A no. 304; and Kiurkchian v. Bulgaria, no. 44626/98, § 51, 24 March 2005). - EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97
WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 29078/07
However, it is not open to the Court to set aside the application of the six months" rule solely because a Government have not made a preliminary objection based on it (see Walker v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I; Belaousof and Others v. Greece, no. 66296/01, § 38, 27 May 2004; Graban v. Poland (dec.), no. 13851/02, 5 July 2005). - EGMR, 27.05.2004 - 66296/01
BELAOUSOF ET AUTRES c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 29078/07
However, it is not open to the Court to set aside the application of the six months" rule solely because a Government have not made a preliminary objection based on it (see Walker v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I; Belaousof and Others v. Greece, no. 66296/01, § 38, 27 May 2004; Graban v. Poland (dec.), no. 13851/02, 5 July 2005). - EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 13851/02
GRABAN v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 29078/07
However, it is not open to the Court to set aside the application of the six months" rule solely because a Government have not made a preliminary objection based on it (see Walker v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 34979/97, ECHR 2000-I; Belaousof and Others v. Greece, no. 66296/01, § 38, 27 May 2004; Graban v. Poland (dec.), no. 13851/02, 5 July 2005).