Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 69343/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,4773) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DURDOVIC AND TRANCÍKOVÁ v. SLOVAKIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Partly struck out of the list Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 69343/11
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 69343/11
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 23865/03
BIC v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 69343/11
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 25763/02
RAPOS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 69343/11
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010). - EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 25951/06
KOMAR v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 69343/11
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Slovakia, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 178-227, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Rapos v. Slovakia, no. 25763/02, §§ 32-34, 20 May 2008; Bic v. Slovakia, no. 23865/03, §§ 39-41, 4 November 2008 or Komár v. Slovakia, no. 25951/06, §§ 30-33, 26 October 2010).