Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ARVELAKIS v. GREECE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.03.2000 - 41354/98
• EGMR, 12.04.2001 - 41354/98

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.04.2001 - 41354/98

  With reference to the principles set out in its established case-law in this area, the Court will assess the reasonableness of the impugned period in light of the complexity of the case, the applicant's conduct and that of the competent authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).

• EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 14258/03

  PARIZOV v.

  According to the Court's case-law, an award can be made in respect of costs and expenses only in so far as they have been actually and necessarily incurred by the applicant and are reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska, cited above, § 62; Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 13270/02

  DIKA v.

  According to the Court's case-law, an award can be made in respect of costs and expenses only in so far as they have been actually and necessarily incurred by the applicant and are reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, cited above, § 62; Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 19.10.2006 - 44208/02

  ARSOV v.

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, among other authorities, Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II).

 
• EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 13904/02

  KRSTO NIKOLOV v.

  According to the Court's case-law, an award can be made in respect of costs and expenses only in so far as they have been actually and necessarily incurred by the applicant and are reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska, cited above, § 62; Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 1636/02

  TAMAMBOGA AND GÜL v. TURKEY

  Recalling that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention imposes on the Contracting States the duty to organise their legal systems in such a way that their courts can meet each of the requirements of that provision, including the obligation to decide cases within a reasonable time (see Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 26, 12 April 2001), the Court considers that the domestic court could have applied stricter measures to speed up the proceedings.
• EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 14818/02

  STOJKOVIC v.

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska, cited above, § 62; Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001 and Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 44221/02

  MIHAJLOSKI v.

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, cited above, § 62; Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 25.09.2008 - 12582/03

  SAVOV AND OTHERS v.

  According to the Court's case-law, an award can be made in respect of costs and expenses only in so far as they have been actually and necessarily incurred by the applicant and are reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 44353/02, § 62, 15 June 2006; Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001; and Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 14349/03

  SALI v.

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, cited above, § 62; Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 05.07.2007 - 22931/03

  LAZAREVSKA v.

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his costs and expenses before this Court only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see Kostovska v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, cited above, § 62; Arvelakis v. Greece, no. 41354/98, § 34, 12 April 2001; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 15.06.2006 - 44353/02

  KOSTOVSKA v.
• EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 44785/98

  KIPER v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 34215/02

  STOJANOV v.
• EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 33046/02

  MITREVSKI v.