Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 26277/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,66431) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
NOSALSKIY v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 26277/02
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 26277/02
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Antonenkov, cited above, §§ 45-46 and, in particular, Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 96, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts) and Pavlyulynets v. Ukraine, no. 70767/01, § 51, 6 September 2005). - EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 70767/01
PAVLYULYNETS v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 26277/02
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Antonenkov, cited above, §§ 45-46 and, in particular, Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 96, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts) and Pavlyulynets v. Ukraine, no. 70767/01, § 51, 6 September 2005). - EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 42987/98
VACHEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 26277/02
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII, Antonenkov, cited above, §§ 45-46 and, in particular, Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 96, ECHR 2004-VIII (extracts) and Pavlyulynets v. Ukraine, no. 70767/01, § 51, 6 September 2005).