Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOTLYAR v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Retroactivity);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  KOTLYAR v. RUSSIA

  Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 56328/10

  ERDTMANN v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2022 - 38825/16

  The present case must further be distinguished from cases in which the applicants were sanctioned for criminally reprehensible acts that they had committed in the preparation of a publication or broadcast (see Erdtmann v. Germany (dec.), no. 56328/10, § 16, 5 January 2016, in which the applicant carried a knife onto an airplane in order to prepare a television documentary about airport security flaws, and Salihu and Others v. Sweden (dec.), no. 33628/15, § 49, 10 May 2016, in which the applicants illegally purchased a firearm to investigate how easy it was to obtain one).
• EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 33628/15

  SALIHU AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2022 - 38825/16

  The present case must further be distinguished from cases in which the applicants were sanctioned for criminally reprehensible acts that they had committed in the preparation of a publication or broadcast (see Erdtmann v. Germany (dec.), no. 56328/10, § 16, 5 January 2016, in which the applicant carried a knife onto an airplane in order to prepare a television documentary about airport security flaws, and Salihu and Others v. Sweden (dec.), no. 33628/15, § 49, 10 May 2016, in which the applicants illegally purchased a firearm to investigate how easy it was to obtain one).
• EGMR, 13.04.2006 - 45963/99

  TSONEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2022 - 38825/16

  The mere fact that the same trial judge had in the past taken part in the criminal case against the applicant does not objectively justify her fears as to a lack of impartiality on his part (see Anguelov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 45963/99, 14 December 2004).

 
• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 28396/95

  Nichtberufung eines liechtensteiner Richters in das Amt des Gerichtspräsidenten …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2022 - 38825/16

  The Court must first ascertain whether the disputed measure - the applicant's conviction for providing "fictitious residence registration" to non-Russian nationals - amounted to interference in the form of a "formality, condition, restriction or penalty" imposed in connection with the exercise of her right to freedom of expression (see Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 43, ECHR 1999-VII).
• VerfG Brandenburg, 25.08.2010 - VfGBbg 11/10

  Ablehnung des Antrags auf Erlass einer eA die darauf gerichtet ist, Träger …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2022 - 38825/16

  12/10/2022.
• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 49327/11

  Ohne Kleidung durch England: Nackt-Wanderer verliert

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2022 - 38825/16

  In so far as the applicant was not prevented from bringing her views to the public's attention, the present case does not concern a restriction on a communicative activity aimed at broader public but rather the taking of measures against the applicant for actions that, under the domestic legal system, infringed criminal law in a manner unrelated to the exercise of freedom of expression (compare Brambilla and Others v. Italy, no. 22567/09, § 57, 23 June 2016, in which the applicants were held liable for illegally intercepting police communications, and, by contrast, Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327/11, § 150, 28 October 2014, in which the applicant's prosecution for appearing naked in public constituted a repressive measure undertaken in reaction to that form of expression).
• EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 9540/07

  MURAT VURAL v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2022 - 38825/16

  In deciding whether a certain act or conduct falls within the ambit of Article 10 of the Convention, an assessment must be made of the nature of the act or conduct in question, in particular of its expressive character seen from an objective point of view, as well as of the purpose or the intention of the person performing the act or carrying out the conduct in question (see Murat Vural v. Turkey, no. 9540/07, § 54, 21 October 2014).
• EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 22567/09

  BRAMBILLA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2022 - 38825/16

  In so far as the applicant was not prevented from bringing her views to the public's attention, the present case does not concern a restriction on a communicative activity aimed at broader public but rather the taking of measures against the applicant for actions that, under the domestic legal system, infringed criminal law in a manner unrelated to the exercise of freedom of expression (compare Brambilla and Others v. Italy, no. 22567/09, § 57, 23 June 2016, in which the applicants were held liable for illegally intercepting police communications, and, by contrast, Gough v. the United Kingdom, no. 49327/11, § 150, 28 October 2014, in which the applicant's prosecution for appearing naked in public constituted a repressive measure undertaken in reaction to that form of expression).

• EGMR, 20.06.2023 - 25285/15

  KARACA c. TÜRKIYE

  Elle y a répondu par la négative, estimant que les soupçons formulés à l'égard du requérant lors de son arrestation ne portaient pas sur l'expression par lui, au moyen d'articles ou de messages écrits ou oraux, d'opinions ou de critiques relativement aux idées propagées par les Tah?Ÿiyeciler, mais sur sa prétendue implication à une éventuelle dénonciation calomnieuse qualifiée et organisée, entrainant la privation des membres de ce groupe de leur liberté (voir, mutatis mutandis, Kotlyar c. Russie, nos 38825/16 et 2 autres, §§ 41 et 43-44, 12 juillet 2022).