Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PAVLOVA v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 39855/03
• EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 39855/03

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 39855/03

  Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy in respect of an arguable complaint of a breach of the requirement of Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 146-57, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 18139/91

  TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 39855/03

  As regards the applicant's request for the Court to rule on the effect the length of the proceedings should have on the calculation of her retirement pension, the Court observes, firstly, that it is not empowered under the Convention to make a ruling such as that requested by the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis, Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, § 72, Series A no. 316-B), and secondly, that this matter does not have a sufficient causal connection with the violations found.
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 39855/03

  A remedy is effective if it prevents the alleged violation or its continuation or provides adequate redress for any beach that has already occurred (ibid., § 158, and Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII).

• EGMR, 19.07.2011 - 30481/05

  DIMOVA AND MINKOVA v. BULGARIA

  It notes that the objections and arguments put forward by the Government have been rejected in earlier similar cases (see the above-cited Kabakchievi judgment, § 52; Pavlova v. Bulgaria, no. 39855/03, § 31, 14 January 2010; and Kotseva-Dencheva v. Bulgaria, no. 12499/05, § 28, 10 June 2010) and sees no reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case.
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 34852/05

  SEMERDZHIEVA v. BULGARIA

  In view of its extensive case-law concerning the length of civil proceedings, including in cases against Bulgaria (see, among many others, Djangozov v. Bulgaria, no. 45950/99, 8 July 2004; Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 47829/99, § 82, 23 September 2004; Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004; Kambourov v. Bulgaria, no. 55350/00, 14 February 2008; and Pavlova v. Bulgaria, no. 39855/03, 14 January 2010), the Court is further satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine).