Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EZEH AND CONNORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-3-c Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 39665/98
• EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 39665/98, 40086/98
• EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 39665/98
• EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 39665/98

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 12547/86

  BENDENOUN c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 39665/98

  This does not exclude that a cumulative approach may be adopted where the separate analysis of each criterion does not make it possible to reach a clear conclusion as to the existence of a "criminal charge" (Garyfallou AEBE v. Greece judgment of 24 September 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 1997-V, § 33; Bendenoun v. France judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 284, § 47, and Lauko v. Slovakia judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, § 57).

  While the actual penalty imposed is relevant (the above-cited Campbell and Fell judgment, § 73; Bendenoun v. France judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 284, § 47; Benham v. the United Kingdom judgment of 10 June 1996, Reports, 1996-III, § 56, and Perks and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 25777/94, 25279/94, 25280/94, 25282/94, 25285/94, 28048/95, 28192/95 and 28456/95, 12 October 1999, unreported, § 76), it cannot diminish the importance of what was initially at stake (the Engel and Others judgment, § 85).

• EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

  Öztürk ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 39665/98

  The seriousness of what is at stake, the traditions of the Contracting States and the importance attached by the Convention to respect for the physical liberty of the person, all require that this should be so (the Engel and Others judgment, § 82, and the Öztürk v. Germany judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, § 53).
• EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

  GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 39665/98

  However, the guarantee of a fair hearing, which is the aim of Article 6, is one of the fundamental principles of any democratic society, within the meaning of the Convention (see the Golder judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 18, para. 36).

 
• EGMR, 28.06.1984 - 7819/77

  CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 39665/98

  In its later Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 June 1984 (Series A no. 80, §§ 68-69), the Court applied these criteria in a prison context:.
• EGMR, 25.04.1983 - 8398/78

  Pakelli ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 39665/98

  The Court recalls that the Convention requires that a person charged with a criminal offence who does not wish to defend himself in person must be able to have recourse to legal assistance of his own choosing (the above-cited Campbell and Fell judgment, § 99, and the Pakelli judgment of 25 April 1983, Series A no. 64, § 31).
• EGMR, 22.05.1990 - 11034/84

  WEBER c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 39665/98

  The Court recalls that, in assessing the nature and degree of severity of the penalty of additional days the applicants "risked" incurring, the risk is determined by reference to the maximum potential penalty applicable to the charges (Weber v. Switzerland judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, § 34; Demicoli v. Malta judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 210, § 34; the above-cited Garyfallou AEBE v. Greece judgment, §§ 33 and 34, and the Steel and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, § 49).
• EGMR, 09.04.1984 - 8966/80

  GODDI v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 39665/98

  They argued that it was necessary for them to show, not that legal representation would have resulted in their acquittal, but rather that the outcome might possibly have been different if they had been represented (Goddi v. Italy judgment of 9 April 1984, Series A no. 76).
• EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 13057/87

  DEMICOLI v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 39665/98

  The Court recalls that, in assessing the nature and degree of severity of the penalty of additional days the applicants "risked" incurring, the risk is determined by reference to the maximum potential penalty applicable to the charges (Weber v. Switzerland judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, § 34; Demicoli v. Malta judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 210, § 34; the above-cited Garyfallou AEBE v. Greece judgment, §§ 33 and 34, and the Steel and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, § 49).

• EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 40086/98
  15.7.2002 in NL 2002, 150.).