Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 16984/04, 9947/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,16740) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BELYAEV AND DIGTYAR v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 34 No violation of Art. 34 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Belyaev and Digtyar v. Ukraine
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 16984/04
- EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 16984/04, 9947/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 15.07.2002 - 47095/99
Russland, Haftbedingungen, EMRK, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 16984/04
As to the Government's plea of non-exhaustion in respect of the physical conditions of the applicant's detention, the Court notes that, on a number of occasions, it has rejected similar objections when it has found that such complaints pointed to problems of a structural nature in the domestic prison system (see, for example, Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, 18 September 2001; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 69-71, 28 March 2006; Koktysh v. Ukraine, no. 43707/07, § 86, 10 December 2009; and Znaykin, cited above, § 43).m, as contended by the Government, the living space, reduced by a sanitary unit, was too little per applicant to comply with the standards recognised by the Court (see, for example, Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 97, ECHR 2002-VI, and Melnik, cited above, § 47, 28 March 2006).
- EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 54825/00
NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 16984/04
These submissions are consistent with the similar numerous cases concerning conditions of detention in Ukrainian pre-trial detention facilities (see, for example, Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, §§ 86-88, ECHR 2005-II (extracts); Dvoynykh v. Ukraine, no. 72277/01, §§ 64-69, 12 October 2006; Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, §§ 84-89, 25 October 2007; Malenko, cited above, § 52; Koktysh, cited above, § 98-100; Visloguzov, cited above, §§ 58-61; Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, §§ 48-52, 20 May 2010; and Znaykin, cited above, §§ 49-53). - EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 35581/06
POKHLEBIN v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 16984/04
These submissions are consistent with the similar numerous cases concerning conditions of detention in Ukrainian pre-trial detention facilities (see, for example, Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, §§ 86-88, ECHR 2005-II (extracts); Dvoynykh v. Ukraine, no. 72277/01, §§ 64-69, 12 October 2006; Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, §§ 84-89, 25 October 2007; Malenko, cited above, § 52; Koktysh, cited above, § 98-100; Visloguzov, cited above, §§ 58-61; Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, §§ 48-52, 20 May 2010; and Znaykin, cited above, §§ 49-53). - EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 72277/01
DVOYNYKH v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 16984/04
These submissions are consistent with the similar numerous cases concerning conditions of detention in Ukrainian pre-trial detention facilities (see, for example, Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, §§ 86-88, ECHR 2005-II (extracts); Dvoynykh v. Ukraine, no. 72277/01, §§ 64-69, 12 October 2006; Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, §§ 84-89, 25 October 2007; Malenko, cited above, § 52; Koktysh, cited above, § 98-100; Visloguzov, cited above, §§ 58-61; Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, §§ 48-52, 20 May 2010; and Znaykin, cited above, §§ 49-53). - EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 15825/06
YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.02.2012 - 16984/04
These submissions are consistent with the similar numerous cases concerning conditions of detention in Ukrainian pre-trial detention facilities (see, for example, Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, §§ 86-88, ECHR 2005-II (extracts); Dvoynykh v. Ukraine, no. 72277/01, §§ 64-69, 12 October 2006; Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, §§ 84-89, 25 October 2007; Malenko, cited above, § 52; Koktysh, cited above, § 98-100; Visloguzov, cited above, §§ 58-61; Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, §§ 48-52, 20 May 2010; and Znaykin, cited above, §§ 49-53).