Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GRIBANENKOV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6 Violation of P1-1 Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 16583/04

  The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 19215/04

  GHEORGHE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 16583/04

  The first period lasted one year and six months, from 17 April 2001 to 17 October 2002, when the court of first instance repeatedly contested its jurisdiction instead of considering the case on the merits (see Gheorghe v. Romania, no. 19215/04, § 58, ECHR 2007-III).
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 16583/04

  Accordingly, the applicant may still claim to be a "victim" (see Lesnova v. Russia, no. 37645/04, § 13, 24 January 2008, and Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 52, ECHR 2009-...).

 
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 16583/04

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 16583/04

  The Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in the enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 22000/03

  RAYLYAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 16583/04

  To decide if the delay was reasonable, the Court will look at how complex the enforcement proceedings were, how the applicant and the authorities behaved, and what the nature of the award was (see Raylyan v. Russia, no. 22000/03, § 31, 15 February 2007).
• EGMR, 06.10.2005 - 63973/00

  ANDROSOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 16583/04

  The Court reiterates that the periods of pure non-enforcement should not be taken into account in respect of the complaint concerning the length of proceedings if the Court has already considered these periods when assessing the complaint about the non-enforcement (see Malama v. Greece, no. 43622/98, § 34 ECHR 2001-II; Androsov v. Russia, no. 63973/00, § 76, 6 October 2005; and Veretennikov v. Russia, no. 8363/03, § 31, 12 March 2009).
• EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 37645/04

  LESNOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 16583/04

  Accordingly, the applicant may still claim to be a "victim" (see Lesnova v. Russia, no. 37645/04, § 13, 24 January 2008, and Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 52, ECHR 2009-...).
• EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 8363/03

  VERETENNIKOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 16583/04

  The Court reiterates that the periods of pure non-enforcement should not be taken into account in respect of the complaint concerning the length of proceedings if the Court has already considered these periods when assessing the complaint about the non-enforcement (see Malama v. Greece, no. 43622/98, § 34 ECHR 2001-II; Androsov v. Russia, no. 63973/00, § 76, 6 October 2005; and Veretennikov v. Russia, no. 8363/03, § 31, 12 March 2009).