Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 19365/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,57123) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
HILL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 13 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 19365/02
- EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 19365/02
- EGMR, 27.04.2004 - 19365/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 71555/01
EINHORN c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 19365/02
Indeed it is not excluded that a life sentence imposed on an adult with no possibility of release might also fall within the scope of Article 3 (no. 7994/77, Commission decision of 6 May 1978, Decisions and Reports 14, p. 239, and Einhorn v. France (dec.), no. 71555/01, ECHR 2001-XI). - EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 19365/02
As regards the applicant's complaint about the length of his detention, the Court's case-law has suggested that a life sentence without any possibility of release imposed on a child even for murder could raise problems under Article 3 (Hussain v. the United Kingdom and Prem Singh v. the United Kingdom, judgments of 21 February 1996, Reports 1996-I, and, more recently, T. v. the United Kingdom and V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 24724/94 and 24888/94, judgments of 16 December 1999). - EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24724/94
Mord an James Bulger
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 19365/02
As regards the applicant's complaint about the length of his detention, the Court's case-law has suggested that a life sentence without any possibility of release imposed on a child even for murder could raise problems under Article 3 (Hussain v. the United Kingdom and Prem Singh v. the United Kingdom, judgments of 21 February 1996, Reports 1996-I, and, more recently, T. v. the United Kingdom and V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 24724/94 and 24888/94, judgments of 16 December 1999). - EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82
BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 19365/02
Finally, concerning the applicant's complaint about the lack of an available remedy for his various grievances, Article 13 applies only where an individual has an "arguable claim" to be the victim of a violation of a Convention right (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52). - EKMR, 06.05.1978 - 7994/77
KOTALLA v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.03.2003 - 19365/02
Indeed it is not excluded that a life sentence imposed on an adult with no possibility of release might also fall within the scope of Article 3 (no. 7994/77, Commission decision of 6 May 1978, Decisions and Reports 14, p. 239, and Einhorn v. France (dec.), no. 71555/01, ECHR 2001-XI).